|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 445-454
Compliance of published randomized controlled trials on the effect of physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea with the consortium's integrated report on clinical trials statement: A critical appraisal of the literature
Elham Manouchehri1, Somayeh Alirezaei2, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari3
1 Student in Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Student in Reproductive Health, Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center; Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
|Date of Submission||14-Jan-2020|
|Date of Decision||03-Aug-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Sep-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||7-Nov-2020|
Dr. Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad; Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are reliable methods for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness, which should be rigorous and must report with clarity. This study aimed to assess the compliance of published RCTs about the effect of physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea with the CONSORT 2017 statement. Materials and Methods: In this study, the review of literature was carried out based on Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). All the clinical trials focused on the effect of the physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea indexed in Web of Science, Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Embase, Magiran and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched using keywords of dysmenorrhea, randomized clinical trial, physical activity and exercise from 2000 to 2019. Out of 1423 articles, 30 RCTs were critically appraised using CONSORT 2017 checklist. The reporting quality score of articles was identified between zero and 43. Results: The compliance rate with the CONSORT checklist was 55.58%. The mean (SD) score of the reporting quality was 23.37 (-5.15) with a minimum of 16 and a maximum of 37. The maximum weakness was in reporting the sample size and full trial protocol 23.33% and 6.67% respectively. Regarding new items of the consort 2017, if the blinding was not possible, the description of any attempts to limit bias was not described in 70% of articles. Conclusions: Reporting sample size, trial protocol, method of blinding, and control of bias are issues that require more attention in reporting of RCT studies. We recommend that the authors use the CONSORT 2017 statement for conducting and reporting the clinical trials.
Keywords: Exersice, dysmenorrhea, randomized controlled trial, review
|How to cite this article:|
Manouchehri E, Alirezaei S, Roudsari RL. Compliance of published randomized controlled trials on the effect of physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea with the consortium's integrated report on clinical trials statement: A critical appraisal of the literature. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2020;25:445-54
|How to cite this URL:|
Manouchehri E, Alirezaei S, Roudsari RL. Compliance of published randomized controlled trials on the effect of physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea with the consortium's integrated report on clinical trials statement: A critical appraisal of the literature. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 16];25:445-54. Available from: https://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2020/25/6/445/300272
| Introduction|| |
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are increasingly being used, and are considered as the highest level of evidence in medical sciences. The design of RCTs, due to their strong robustness in producing data is associated with less bias and it is obvious that it produces the most valuable data. So they are the most reliable ways of assessing the effectiveness of treatments in the field of medical sciences. Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is based on the results of RCTs because the results of this type of study is objective, scientific, and methodical. The quality assessment of articles plays an important role in the establishment of EBM and improves the quality of services in the field of health through applying the results of these research in the clinical settings. EBM also improves the cost-effectiveness of services by eliminating unnecessary medical expenses. Consequently, there is a major effort to improve the reporting quality of the clinical trials., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) developed by the CONSORT Group to decrease the problems resulted from inadequate reporting of randomized controlled trials. It is part of the larger Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network, which is an international initiative aimed at enhancing the transparency and accuracy of reporting in health research to increase the merit and reliability of medical research literature. The CONSORT 2010 toolkit and CONSORT 2017 tool, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), contains a checklist and a flowchart that authors can use to report RCTs. Many of the prestigious medical journals and international review teams use this tool to facilitate quality assessment and interpretation of RCTs.
Non-Pharmacologic Treatments (NPTs) such as surgery, rehabilitation, education, and psychotherapy are a range of interventions that have specific methodology complications, such as the complexity of the intervention process, the impact of the care providers, the care centers' expertise, and blinding problems. For this reason, the CONSORT Group designed a separate version for the NPT studies, which was first published in 2008. Changes made to the CONSORT 2017 for NPT studies include changes in the tool for better understanding for its users, and it has 3 new items. The 2017 version of CONSORT for NPT studies help authors, reviewers, and researchers to clarify the reports and evaluate the quality of articles.
Dysmenorrhea is one of the problems that cause women to use some NPTs. Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD) is known to occur in the absence of pathologic causes, but in the secondary dysmenorrhea, pains follow the pathology of pelvic organs. In a systematic review, the incidence of dysmenorrhea was 17–80%. The most commonly used drugs to treat PD are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, 10–25% of women do not respond to these drugs or the side effects of these drugs are not tolerable to them or they are not generally in agreement with drug use. Millions of women with PD are seeking alternative therapies, complementary treatments, and natural treatments, and there are many effective therapies that can relieve dysmenorrhea, which include the use of essential fatty acids, vitamins, acupuncture, herbal remedies, aromatherapy, reflexology, acupressure, massage therapy, and physical activities. Exercise (physical activity) reduces dysmenorrhea by improving the blood flow to the pelvic organs and stimulating the release of beta-endorphins, a non-specific pain reliever. Also, most exercise interventions in dysmenorrhea have little side effects and are preferred to pharmacologic and herbal therapies. Different types of exercise have been investigated in several studies, but clinical trials have not been critically evaluated on the effects of exercise on PD. Also, no study has met the full CONSORT guideline for NPT RCTs for assessing the reporting quality of studies on this issue. Inadequate and poor quality reporting of clinical trials is a problem that interferes with researchers ability to assess, appraise, replicate, and synthesize study findings and influences physicians, clinicians, health professionals and policy-makers' decision-making. Assessing the reporting quality of published clinical trials is an essential way to identify items that need improvement in future articles. Considering the importance of RCTs in therapeutic interventions, the present study was conducted to review the literature to identify the compliance of published RCTs regarding the effect of physical activity on PD with the CONSORT statement extension 2017.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In this study, the review of the literature was carried out based on Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). CONSORT Statement is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations and standard way for authors to report randomized clinical trial findings, transparently. In addition to reporting, it aids their critical appraisal and interpretation. The literature search for RCTs related to the effect of physical activity on PD was conducted for published documents from 1st January 2000 until 30th December 2019. Journals were indexed in the databases of Web of Science (12), Pubmed (30), Scopus (136), Google Scholar (1030), ScienceDirect (9), Embase (172) and also Magiran (32) and Scientific Information Database (SID) (2). The articles were searched by English and Persian keywords of “randomized controlled trial”, “clinical trial”, “ treatment of dysmenorrhea “, “pain of period”, “exercise”, “yoga”, “physical activity”, or combining these words in the title and abstract. The included articles were clinical trials focused on all physical activities for PD treatment in non-athletic women. They were also in Persian and English languages, where original research and their full text was available. Studies including meta-analysis, case-control, observational, cross-sectional, cohort, and case studies were excluded. There were 1423 studies, which had the inclusion criteria and were collected using the EndNote software in a separate library file. Of these, 208 duplicate articles were eliminated. The articles were evaluated in terms of their titles and abstracts through which 1118 articles were eliminated. Of the remaining 97 articles, 67 articles were excluded in the full text screening due to not being relevant. Finally, 30 articles related to the topic of the study were included in the process of critical appraisal. The process of selecting articles is shown in [Figure 1]. To be assured of the retrieval of all related articles, the search for articles in databases was repeated by the co-author.
The CONSORT 2017 extension was used for the quality assessment of selected articles. This tool consists of 6 sections and 43 items. The scores of the articles were classified into four categories: poor (<10.50), average (10.50-21), good (22-31.50), and excellent (31.50-43). The articles were assessed by two researchers, independently. A random sample of 10 articles was crosschecked to ensure about the accuracy and inter-rater concordance. In the cases of inconsistency, the supervisor's opinion was used. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, IBM, USA), version 19A.
Intellectual property rights were considered for all the authors. All articles were reviewed in the initial screening. They were not included in the study if they did not comply with the inclusion criteria.
| Results|| |
In this study, 30 articles were assessed for quality assessment, regarding the effect of physical activity on the PD. Articles were published between 2006 and 2017. Most articles 6 (20%) were published in 2016 and the least articles were published in 2006, 2010, and 2011 (3.33%). Most studies were conducted in Iran [15 (50%)], followed by India [7 (23.33%)] and Egypt, New Zealand, and South Korea [1 (3.33%)] [Table 1]. The language of 23 (76.67%) articles were English. The authors of 10 (33.33%) articles were midwives, 2 (6.67%) articles were yoga specialists, 4 (13.33%) articles were physiotherapists and 2 (6.67%) articles were rehabilitation specialists. Also, in 3 (10%) articles, the study was conducted by gynecologists, in 4 (13.33%) articles by physical education and sport science specialists, in 2 (6.67%) articles by sport physicians and in 1 (3.33%) article by a nurse. Only in 13.33% of the articles statisticians were contributed. The mean length of articles' review process was 4 months, varied from 1 to 8 months. The overall compliance rate of the selected articles with CONSORT 2017 was 55.58%. The highest score attributed to the articles was 83.70% and the lowest score was 37.20% [Table 2].
|Table 2: The mean (SD) and the minimum and maximum scores for each of the 6 examined sections|
Click here to view
The results of the critical appraisal of RCTs showed that in the title and abstract section, 20 articles (66.67%) did not mention the phrase of “Randomized clinical trial”. In introduction section, 11 articles (36.67%) did not report the specific assumptions and aims. In the method section, only 9 (30%) studies explained how the care providers joined the program (5d), while 17 (56.67%) article provided explanations for joining the participants (5e). Also only 2 (6.67%) studies mentioned the sample size. Additionally, only 2 (6.67%) studies clearly outlined the inclusion criteria. The lack of reporting precise randomization process was not reported about blinding the random allocation method [9 (30%) articles], identification the individuals who did randomized allocation sequences of [10 (33.33%) articles)] as well as description of the method of blinding [5 (16.67%) articles]. Also 9 (30%) studies that had no possibility of blindness, explained the methods of bias reduction. Regarding statistical analysis, 16 studies (53.33%) defined statistical methods to compare the primary and secondary outcomes of the groups, and 12 (40%) explained the methods used in additional analyzes such as subgroup and modified analyzes.
In the section of results, only 8 (26.67%) studies explained the missing or excluded subjects in each group and 3 (10%) studies reported unintended effects. 11 (36.67%) studies did not list the number of participants entered in the analysis in each group. Only 19 (63.33%) studies reported the results of primary and secondary outcomes in each group (17a), and 26 (86.67%) studies reported both absolute and relative effect sizes (17b). 11 (36.67%) articles did not report the results of any sub-analysis such as subgroup analysis or modified analysis due to initial exploratory analysis. Only 3 (10%) studies reported unintended effects.
About discussion section, 15 (50%) articles mentioned the study limitations about the bias sources. Also 19 (63.33%) studies outlined the generalizability of their study findings, and 24 (80%) articles with a balance of benefits and harms and consideration of other relevant evidence interpreted consistently with the results. Finally, about the section of “other information” of CONSORT tool, 24 (80%) articles did not indicate the registration number and setting of the clinical trials. 93.33% of studies did not present instruction or protocol on the type of intervention, and 9 (30%) studies did not mention funding sources [Table 3]. [Table 3] shows the reporting of methodological details.
|Table 3: Quality of published clinical trial reports on the effect of physical activity on the severity of dysmenorrhea using the CONSORT* 2017 tool|
Click here to view
Since CONSORT 2017 tool was used for critical appraisal of articles in this study, some items were added to the 2010 version included: how to standardize the intervention and how caregivers and participants' adherance to the protocole was assessed. In this regard, 76.67%, 30%, and 56.67% of the studies reported these issues, respectively. Regarding the item of the delay between randomization and intervention, it was not mentioned in 36.67% of articles.
| Discussion|| |
This critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature provided a picture of the compliance of RCTs published about the effect of physical activity on PD with the CONSORT 2017 statement for NPTs. This appraisal showed that the reporting quality of RCTs has many problems, especially in those items relevant to the internal validity of trials such as randomization, allocation concealment mechanism, blinding, sample size, the flow of participants in the trial, and during the follow-up.
In our study, the overall quality of articles was categorized as medium to good quality. It was similar to the overall quality in a study that reviewed 47 clinical trials on the effect of complementary medicine on menopausal symptoms. Whereas, it was higher than the overall quality of 20 clinical trials reported in relation to the efficacy of massage therapy on labor pain intensity in the study of Irani et al. (2017), which classified as medium to low-level quality. The probable reason for this difference could be the type of articles included in the two studies. The study of Irani et al. (2017) was on the articles published in Persian journals, whereas the articles in this study were indexed in both English and Persian databases that possibly have different qualities. This result has been reported in other studies as well., This is possibly due to not enough attention of included journals to clinical trial reporting.
In our study, the overall compliance rate of articles with CONSORT 2017 statement was 55.58%. A systematic review conducted on 55 RCTs published in plastic surgery concluded that, on average, RCTs comply with just half of the CONSORT items that is in line with some other studies.,, But in the study of Salesi et al., only one-third of the articles achieved the maximum possible score on the scale, in which the evaluated clinical trials were all published in the Journal of Military Medicine of Baqiyatallah University, Iran; while in our study the various journals with different languages were included. Therefore, it seems that the trials published in general journals with general scope have higher report quality. The lack of compliance could be due to unawareness of the authors, lack of training on the distinctions of doing a clinical trial, and careless reviewing by the reviewers of these articles. In study by Geonka et al. (2019), the compliance rate per a sections of the CONSORT tool was reported higher than the present study; but the poorest and the strongest sections were consistent with the present study. The possible reason for the higher quality in the aforementioned study is appraising the RCTs published only in 2017 in Indian medical journals, and it seems that overal compliance with the CONSORT tool has increased over time.,, Regarding our findings, most of the RCTs did not mention the phrase of “randomized trial in the title” (1a). This finding is in contrast with some studies, and is in line with another study. The present study showed that adherence to the item of reporting objectives and hypotheses in the introduction were consistent with some other studies.,
In order to design a clinical trial study, for demonstrating the power of the test and its generalizability and also to compare it with other clinical trials, a very important issue is to estimate the appropriate sample size. In our study, only about one-fifth of articles mentioned the method of sample size caculation. Many studies have also reported the same methodological flaws.,,,,,,, But in a study by Ghojazadeh et al. on 114 RCTs, more than three-fifth of articles mentioned the sample size calculation method. Because the critical quality assessment is being done on the top ranked English-language journals. Similar to other studies, a few articles in the present study reported the changes to methods after the trial begins, which may be due to making no important changes to methods after the trial started.,, According to the present study, most of the articles did not use a statistician in the process of their research, and the low proficiency of clinicians in statistics and methodology is a reason for the poor quality of clinical trials. If the randomization was done correctly and appropriately, the apparent and hidden biases could be reduced.
As determined by CONSORT 2017, the major limitation was in reporting of methodology. Our results showed that about half of the articles used a suitable method for random allocation of a sample, while in the study of Moosavi et al. one-third of the articles used a suitable method for this purpose. Other studies reported a lower score for this item.,, It is due to the quality or scope of the journals in the mentioned studies., In the present study, only one-third of the articles reported allocation concealment. A systematic review of the quality of RCTs on Iranian traditional medicine, revealed that about two-thirds of articles were deficient in reporting random sequence generation and allocation concealment mechanism. Also, in a study that assessed the quality of RCTs published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), JAMA, and Lancet, about half of the studies were conducted with uncertain concealment of allocation. Although in the mentioned studies, the quality evaluation was done on reliable journals, the allocation concealment report was still low. Gohari et al. (2016) and Bahmani et al. (2019) described the adherence to allocation concealment as poor.,, The RCT results will be biased with these methodological flaws. In the trials in which the allocation sequence has been inadequately or indefinitely concealed, larger estimates of treatment effects would be reported by mistake.
Only about one-third of the articles did blinding. The reason might be the type of intervention, which was some kind of physical activities, and this could justify the impossibility of the blindness in appraised studies, but most of them did not mention the methods of reducing bias, which is similar to the findings of some other studies,, Bahmani et al., similarly, reported only one-third adherence to blinding items.,, These flaws reduce the validity of the findings reported by articles.
Regarding the report of effect sizes for binary outcomes (17b), the RCTs are so poor in the present and other studies.,, According to nojomi et al. (2013), only 8.4% of articles reported this section. But in the present study the review showed that it has been reported in one-third of studies. One possible explanation is that Nojomi et al. only searched one database (Iranmedex) with one search term for two years (2008-2010) and only included articles published in Iranian journals in the study.
As the findings of other studies, our results revealed that half of the included RCTs did not describe their limitations., In a study about quality assessment of Iranian articles, about one-fifth of articles reported limitations, sufficiently. The limitations must be stated for assessing the applicability of trials in real conditions and having a better interpretation of the results.
Similar to other studies,,,, only one-fifth of the RCTs had a trial registration number. In one study, it was reported in only one-tenth of RCTs. The clinical trial registration number reduces the error of similar articles and is critical to increasing public transparency and public confidence in the process. In our study, RCTs were poor in terms of reporting of significant harms, and source of funding, which is in line with findings reported by Borrelli et al., Nojomi et al. and Karpouzis et al. But in a study aimed to explore the quality of reporting RCTs of the cardiovascular therapeutic medical devices, the compliance with registration, protocol and funding section was high (≥90%). The cause of this inconsistency is that the mentioned study included articles published in five leading the general journals with high impact factor.
Poor reporting of the RCTs makes its difficult for readers to assess the validity of the trials and to correctly use research evidence to guide their clinical decision makings. Clear and transparent reporting improves the quality of evidence and applicability of findings. So, we suggest CONSORT adoption by journals for improving the reporting quality of RCTs. In this critical review, the authors assessed the quality of studies using the standard CONSORT 2017 tool to facilitate decision making about treatment effectiveness. Nevertheless, further studies are required to assess more recent articles in other fields to investigate barriers of compliance with the CONSORT statement. On the other hand, sometimes the word limitation of journals may compromise the reporting quality of the articles. We recommend that journals modify the word count requirements, or provide online sources to allow authors to show the important omitted components.
One of the limitations of this study was that we only assessed the RCTs published in English and Persian journals from 2000 to 2019, so the results cannot fully represent the reporting quality of all NPT RCTs in the under study topic. Second, some CONSORT items are much more important, but because of the lack of evidence for weighing items, we also considered equal weight for all items. Using a new version of the CONSORT tool was one of the strengths of this study. Also, compliance with the CONSORT criteria about the effect of physical activity on PD has not previously been assessed. Additionally, reporting quality assessment was done by two reviewers and a sample of articles was cross-checked between them. A high level of agreement ensures the consistency and reliability of the results.
| Conclusion|| |
In summary, the reporting quality of NPT RCTs is suboptimal and reporting of RCTs still requires improvement. Especially in methodology items, bias reduction techniques and providing explanations to increase the quality of articles and their applicability in the clinical settings. So we suggest that all medical journals should recommend CONSORT statement in their “Instruction/Guide for authors” for improving the reporting quality of RCTs. Also, authors are recommended to design and report the results of their non-pharmacologic treatment clinical trials using the standard CONSORT 2017 extension to assist clinicians for decision making on treatment effectiveness.
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the librarians who helped them to access information resources in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nothing to declare.
| References|| |
Uetani K, Nakayama T, Ikai H, Yonemoto N, Moher D. Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan: Evaluation of adherence to the CONSORT statement. Intern Med 2009;48:307-13.
Shein-Chung C, Liu J. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials: Concepts and Methodologies. Wiley; 2013.
Jo JK, Autorino R, Chung JH, Kim KS, Lee JW, Baek EJ, et al
. Randomized controlled trials in endourology: A quality assessment. J Endourol 2013;27:1055-60.
Altman DG. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: Survey of instructions for authors. BMJ 2005;330:1056-7.
Gagnier J, Boon H, Rochon P, Barnes J, Moher D, Bombardier C, et al
. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: Implementing the CONSORT statement [corrected]. Explore (NY) 2006;2:143-9.
Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest 2010;40:35-53.
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al
. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:332.
Fan F-f, Xu Q, Sun Q, Zhao S-j, Wang P, Guo X-R. Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on treatment of coronary heart disease with traditional Chinese medicine from the Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine: A systematic review. PloS One 2014;9:e86360.
Cook JA. The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials 2009;10:9.
Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Internal Med 2008;148:295-309.
Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: A 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:40-7.
Shavandi N, Taghian F, Soltani V. The effect of isometric exercise on primary dismenorrhea. Arak Med Univ J 2010;13:71-7.
Morrow C, Naumburg EH. Dysmenorrhea. Primary Care 2009;36:19-32.
Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: A neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006;6:177.
Onur O, Gumus I, Derbent A, Kaygusuz I, Simavli S, Urun E, et al
. Impact of home-based exercise on quality of life of women with primary dysmenorrhoea. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;18.
Harel Z. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults: An update on pharmacological treatments and management strategies. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012;13:2157-70.
Abaraogu UO, Tabansi-Ochiogu CS, Igwe ES. Effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain and quality of life of patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2016;62:346-54.
Kannan P, Chapple CM, Miller D, Claydon LS, Baxter GD. Menstrual pain and quality of life in women with primary dysmenorrhea: Rationale, design, and interventions of a randomized controlled trial of effects of a treadmill-based exercise intervention. Contemp Clin Trials 2015;42:81-9.
Yang N-Y, Kim S-D. Effects of a yoga program on menstrual cramps and menstrual distress in undergraduate students with primary dysmenorrhea: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med 2016;22:732-8.
Azima S, Bakhshayesh HR, Abbasnia K, Kaviani M, Sayadi M. The effect of isometric exercises on primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Galen Med J 2015;4:26-32.
Azima S, Bakhshayesh HR, Kaviani M, Abbasnia K, Sayadi M. Comparison of the effect of massage therapy and isometric exercises on primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015;28:486-91.
Yonglitthipagon P, Muansiangsai S, Wongkhumngern W, Donpunha W, Chanavirut R, Siritaratiwat W, et al
. Effect of yoga on the menstrual pain, physical fitness, and quality of life of young women with primary dysmenorrhea. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2017;21:840-6.
Vaziri F, Hoseini A, Kamali F, Abdali K, Hadianfard M, Sayadi M. Comparing the effects of aerobic and stretching exercises on the intensity of primary dysmenorrhea in the students of universities of bushehr. J Fam Reprod Health 2015;9:23-8.
Shirvani MA, Motahari-Tabari N, Alipour A. Use of ginger versus stretching exercises for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med 2017;15:295-301.
Saleh H, Mowafy H, El Hameid A. Stretching or core strengthening exercises for managing primary dysmenorrhea. J Women's Health Care 2016;5:. doi: 10.4172/2167-0420.1000295
Rakhshaee Z. Effect of three yoga poses (cobra, cat and fish poses) in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2011;24:192-6.
Chaudhuri A, Singh A, Dhaliwal L. A randomised controlled trial of exercise and hot water bottle in the management of dysmenorrhoea in school girls of Chandigarh, India. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2013;57:114-22.
Reyhani T, Jafarnejad F, Behnam H, Ajam M, Baghaei M. The effect of brisk walking on primary dysmenorrhea in girl students. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013;16:14-9.
Shahrjerdi S, Shaych Hosaini R. The effect of 8 weeks stretching exercise on primary dysmenorrhea in 15-17 aged high school student girls in Arak. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2010;11:84-91.
Paithankar SM, Hande D. Effectiveness of pilates over conventional physiotherapeutic treatment in females with primary dysmmenorrhea. IOSR-JDMS 2016;15:156-63.
Rezvani S, Taghian F, Valiani M. The effect of aquatic exercises on primary dysmenorrhoea in nonathlete girls. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013;18:378.
Motahari-Tabari N, Shirvani MA, Alipour A. Comparison of the effect of stretching exercises and mefenamic acid on the reduction of pain and menstruation characteristics in primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized clinical trial. Oman Med J 2017;32:47-53.
Abbaspour Z, Rostami M, Najjar S. The effect of exercise on primary dysmenorrhea. J Res Health Sci 2006;6:26-31.
Ortiz MI, Cortés-Márquez SK, Romero-Quezada LC, Murguía-Cánovas G, Jaramillo-Díaz AP. Effect of a physiotherapy program in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;194:24-9.
Shah S, Verma N, Begani P, Nagar H, Mujawar N. Effect of exercises on primary dysmenorrhoea in young females. Int J Physiother Res 2016;4:1658-62.
Salehi F, Marefati H, Mehrabian H, Sharifi H. Effect of pilates exercise on primary dysmenorrhea. J Res Rehabil Sci 2012;1:248-53.
Siahpour T, Nikbakht M, Rahimi E, Rabiee M. The effect of 8 weeks aerobic exercise and yoga on primary dismenorrhea. Armaghane Danesh 2013;18:475-83.
Heidarianpour A, Dalir FZ. The effects of 8 weeks of moderate intensity aerobic exercise on menstrual cycle disorders and serum levels of sex hormones in non athlete women. SJKUMS 2016;21:103-11.
Nasri M BA, Ramezani AR. Comparison of aerobic training and pelvic floor muscle exercise on primary dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls. J Clin Nurs Midwifery 2016;5:9.
Gamit KS, Sheth MS, Vyas NJ. The effect of stretching exercise on primary dysmenorrhea in adult girls. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014;3:549-51.
Kanwal R, Masood T, Awan WA, Babur MN, Baig MS. Effectiveness of TENS versus stretching exercises on primary dysmenorrhea in students. Int J Rehabil Sci 2017;5:18-24.
Mahvash N, Eidy A, Mehdi K, Zahra MT, Mani M, Shahla H. The effect of physical activity on primary dysmenorrhea of female university students. World Appl Sci J 2012;17:1246-52.
Gupta R, Kaur S, Singh A. Comparison to assess the effectiveness of active exercises and dietary ginger vs. active exercises on primary dysmenorrhea among adolescent girls. Nurs Midwifery Res 2013;9:168-77.
Nag U, Kodali M. Meditation and yoga as alternative therapy for primary dysmenorrhea. Int J Med Pharm Sci 2013;3:39.
Thoke AV, Gawali MH. Effects of surya namaskar and yoga nidra on physical problems of adolescent girls during their menstruation. GOEIJ 2015;4.
Dauneria S, Keswani J. A study on the effect of yoga and naturopathy on dysmenorrhea. Int J Yoga Allied Sci 2014;3.
Sarayloo K, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Critical evaluation of the published clinical trials regarding the effect of complementary medicine on menopausal symptoms. Iran. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Infertil 2018;21:87-98.
Irani M, Maleki N, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in relation to the efficacy of massage therapy on labor pain intensity using CONSORT criteria. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2017;20:56-67.
Sarveravan P, Astaneh B, Shokrpour N. Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of randomized controlled trials on pharmacological interventions published in iranian medical journals. Iran J Med Sci 2017;42:532-43.
Habibi A, Salehi A, Vardanjani HM. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of Iranian traditional medicine: An eight-year study. Eur J Integr Med 2020;33:101040.
Agha RA, Camm CF, Doganay E, Edison E, Siddiqui MR, Orgill DP. Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: A systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plastic Surg 2014;37:55-62.
Goenka L, Rajendran S, Arumugam K, Rani J, George M. The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals. Perspect Clin Res 2019;10:79-83.
] [Full text]
Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Andrew TW, Chicco M, Abukhder M, Mobarak D, et al
. Assessing the compliance of randomized controlled trials published in craniofacial surgery journals with the CONSORT statement. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:96-104.
Maryam BJ, Alireza S, Maryam M, Amin H. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. J Scientometric Res 2019;8:102-8.
Salesi M, Maghari A, Mohammadi E, Yekaninejad M, Ghanbari A. Quality assessment of published randomized controlled trials in the journal of military medicine during 1999-2015. J Mil Med 2017;19:106-25.
Kim Y-J, Lee MS, Yang YS, Hur M-H. Self-aromatherapy massage of the abdomen for the reduction of menstrual pain and anxiety during menstruation in nurses: A placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Integr Med 2011;3:e165-e8.
Gohari F, Baradaran HR, Tabatabaee M, Anijidani S, Touserkani FM, Atlasi R, et al
. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2015;15:36.
Xu Lin LJ, Zhang Mingming, Ai Changlin, Wang Ling. Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals. Contemp Clin Trials 2008;29:727-31.
Nojomi M, Ramezani M, Ghafari-Anvar A. Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials published in Iranian journals: Application of the new version of consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Arch Iranian Med 2013;16:20-2.
Chen W, Yu J, Zhang L, Su G, Wang W, Kwong J, et al
. Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices. Surgery 2019;165:965-9.
Ghojazadeh M, Tavananezhad N, Karkhanee M, Naghavi Behzad M, Azami Aghdash S. Quality of randomized clinical trial reports published by iranian researchers in the obstetrics and gynecology level 1 journals: Using consort. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013;16:7-15.
Karpouzis F, Bonello R, Pribicevic M, Kalamir A, Brown BT. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist. Chiropr Man Therap 2016;24:19.
Celentano DD, Mhs S. Gordis Epidemiology. Elsevier; 2018.
Moosavi S, Rohani C. Critical appraisal of the randomized controlled trial studies reports in nursing journals. Iran J Nurs Res 2016;11:37-47.
Hewitt C, Hahn S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J, Bland JM. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: Review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. BMJ 2005;330:1057-8.
Chan A-W, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet 2005;365:1159-62.
Ntala C, Birmpili P, Worth A, Anderson NH, Sheikh A. The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: A systematic review. Prim Care Respir J 2013;22:417-24.
Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu L-M, Chan A-W, Altman DG. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: Comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ 2010;340:c723.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]