Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 219
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 311-315

Psychosocial factors related to dietary habits in women undergoing preconception care


1 Students Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication25-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Nafisehsadat Nekuei
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_22_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Correct health behaviors such as dietary habits before pregnancy ensure desired pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between psychosocial factors and dietary habits using social cognitive theory (SCT) in women undergoing preconception care (PCC). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 120 women from October to December 2015 in health centres in Isfahan, Iran. Using a researcher-made questionnaire, the researcher conducted stratified random sampling and convenience sampling for selecting health centres and participants, respectively. For data analysis, the researcher applied the Pearson, Spearman's, and linear regression test in SPSS software. Results: The results showed that perceived support from healthcare personnel and outcome expectations are not associated with any of the components of dietary habits. Access to healthy food was inversely correlated with incorrect dietary habits (β = −0.19, p = 0.039) and had a direct correlation with daily consumption of fruits (β = 0.27, p = 0.006). Perceived support from the spouse had a direct correlation with desired dietary habits (β = 0.27, p = 0.006). Self-efficacy was inversely correlated with incorrect dietary habits (β = −0.22, p = 0.011) and had a direct relationship with desired dietary habits (β = 0.25, p = 0.004). Conclusions: To improve the nutritional status of women prior to pregnancy, interventions must be focused on increasing women's access to healthy food and their self-efficacy in maintaining a healthy diet.

Keywords: Food habits, Iran, preconception care, psychosocial factors


How to cite this article:
Karami Z, Nekuei N, Kazemi A, Paknahad Z. Psychosocial factors related to dietary habits in women undergoing preconception care. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2018;23:311-5

How to cite this URL:
Karami Z, Nekuei N, Kazemi A, Paknahad Z. Psychosocial factors related to dietary habits in women undergoing preconception care. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 1];23:311-5. Available from: https://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2018/23/4/311/234939




  Introduction Top


Although correct health behaviors and a healthy lifestyle before pregnancy ensure appropriate pregnancy outcomes,[1],[2] there is a high prevalence of unhealthy behaviors among women during the preconception period.[3],[4] An important and amendable factor of lifestyle that can be targeted in preconception interventions is suitable dietary habits and nutrition.[5] Appropriate preconception nutrition with weight adjustment and suitable metabolic conditions reduces the chances of adverse gestational and fetal complications including diabetes [6] and gestational hypertension,[7],[8] fetal neural tube defects, macrosomia,[9] and adult obesity.[10] On the other hand, to establish a significant influence on gestational outcomes, the modification and management of nutritional risk factors before pregnancy have been suggested.[8],[11] This is because most vital organs of a fetus are formed in the first few weeks after conception, and the fetus is influenced by environmental, biological, and nutritional factors. Hence, preconception care (PCC) is one of the most important visits for women preparing for pregnancy.[12],[13] For more effective consultation and improvement of the nutritional status of women before pregnancy, similar to other health-related behaviors, it is essential to identify the dietary habits and nutritional behavior of women before pregnancy.[14] There have been a few studies on the nutritional behaviors of women before pregnancy and their relationship with other factors including body mass index (BMI),[15] women's lack of knowledge about suitable nutrition,[16] and the role of the spouse.[17] The aforementioned studies, however, considered individual factors. This is despite the fact that, according to studies, women's preconception nutrition does not have appropriate quality and quantity.[18],[19] It has been shown that the consumption of foods such as milk and dairy products by women of reproductive age was acceptable, but their intake of fruits and vegetables was less than the recommended intake.[18] On the other hand, studies that are implemented based on important behavioral theories provide a more logical and appropriate framework for identifying the root of behaviors and the factors influencing them, and more accurate strategies for interventions.[20],[21] One of the strongest behavioral theories is the social cognitive theory (SCT). This theory considers triple causality including individual, environmental, and behavioral factors which interact with each other.[22]

According to previous studies and experiences, it seems that environment, behavior outcome expectations, and self-efficacy are the most important and effective structures of this theory in preconception. The environment is defined as the social or physical situation or condition of the individual.[23] In the present study, access to healthy food and perceived support by the spouse and health care experts involved in PCC, which are physical and social conditions, respectively, were investigated. Outcome expectation is also a prediction of the possible consequences of conflicts in correct dietary habits.[23] Self-efficacy refers to the person's trust in her/his ability to follow correct nutritional behaviors to achieve the desired result.[24] Due to scarcity of studies on effective factors on dietary habits of women before pregnancy, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships between psychosocial factors and dietary habits in women undergoing PCC using SCT.


  Materials and Methods Top


The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 women selected among women undergoing PCC in Isfahan, Iran. The inclusion criteria included absence of any known psychological illness and a specific diet due to medical advice, and the exclusion criteria included incomplete questionnaires as well as unwillingness to cooperate. Data collection was conducted between October and December 2015. The participants were selected through stratified random sampling; 2 health networks (1 and 2) from Isfahan were selected as stratification, 5 health centres were randomly selected from within each network, and 12 available participants were selected from each health centre. Considering Z1 = 1.96, Z2 = 0.84, and r = 0.25 (according to the pilot study), the researcher selected 120 participants. A 4-part researcher-made questionnaire was designated as the data collection tool. After registering personal characteristics such as age, education level, occupation, gravidity, and economic status, the researcher calculated BMI [weight (kg)/height (m 2)] by applying an adult weighting scale and wall meter. The questionnaire also contained questions related to SCT and dietary habit variables. These sections were completed as a self-administered questionnaire.

SCT variables included environment, outcome expectations, and self-efficacy. The environment variable included physical and social aspects (personnel and spouse). The purpose of the physical environment was access to healthy food (3 items; for example, enough fruits are available for me), and the purpose of the social environment was the perceived support provided by health care personnel (5 items; for example, health care personnel encourage me to eat healthy food) and the spouse (6 items; for example, my spouse does not care about my food). In total, 14 items were related to this variable, 5 to outcome expectations (for example, I help the health of fetus by considering a healthy diet before pregnancy), and 5 to self-efficacy (for example, I can avoid fatty food even in parties). The next part of the questionnaire regarding dietary habits consisted of 4 parts. Part I was related to incorrect dietary habits with 7 items (for example, when I get angry I overeat). Part II was related to desired dietary habits with 15 items (for instance, eating whole bread instead of white bread). Part III dealt with dietary habits related to consumption of unhealthy food in the past month with 6 questions (for example, how often did you eat pizza and fast food in the past month?). Part IV consisted of 4 questions about units of daily consumption of meat, vegetables, fruits, and dairy products. The items were based on a review of scientific literature and were scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (disagree to completely agree).

To validate the tools, content validity was determined through the use of the judgment of experts and to evaluate their reliability, an internal reliability test was conducted in a pilot study with 20 eligible patients. Cronbach's alpha of higher than 0.70 was confirmed for all variables (for total SCT variables α = 0.88, for outcome expectations α = 0.75, for self-efficacy α = 0.70, for health care support α = 0.80, for spouse support α = 0.90, for accessibility α = 0.70, and for dietary habits α = 0.75). Applying SPSS software (version 18, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), the researcher analyzed the data using descriptive tests (mean and frequency) and analytic tests (Pearson correlation and multivariate linear regression by entering all related predictor variables based on the Pearson test). All p values of less than 0.050 were considered significant.

Ethical consideration

All participants in this study provided written informed consent forms. They were assured that their identities would be kept confidential, and they were given freedom to leave the study whenever they desired. This study was performed under the financial support of the Vice Chancellor of Research and Technology of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, and with the approval code of IR.mui.rec. 1394.3.474 (2015.8.9).


  Results Top


All 120 participants in this study fully responded to the questionnaire. The results showed that the majority of women had high school educational level (58.30%, intermediate economic status (80.80%), and were homemakers (85.80%). Other demographic characteristics of the participants, average score of SCT structures, and women's dietary habits are listed in [Table 1]. The results of the Pearson test showed that among the structures of SCT examined in this study, the structure of access to healthy food and self-efficacy were the most relevant to the components of dietary habits [Table 2]. The results of the multivariate linear regression tests showed that perceived support from healthcare personnel and outcome expectations were not associated with any of the components of dietary habits. The variable of access to healthy food was inversely correlated with incorrect dietary habits (β = −0.19, p = 0.039) and had a direct correlation with daily consumption of fruits (β = 0.27, p = 0.006) and dairy products (β = 0.24, p = 0.011). Perceived support from the spouse had a direct correlation with desired dietary habits (β = 0.27, p = 0.006) and daily consumption of dairy products (β = 0.25, p = 0.011). However, self-efficacy was inversely correlated with incorrect dietary habits (β = −0.22, p = 0.011) and unhealthy food consumption (β = −0.22, p = 0.012) and had a direct relationship with desired dietary habits (β = 0.25, p = 0.004) and daily consumption of meat (β = 0.18, p = 0.042) [Table 3].
Table 1: The results of descriptive data analysis

Click here to view
Table 2: Pearson Correlation between social cognitive theory constructs and dietary habits (n=120)

Click here to view
Table 3: Multivariate linear regressions with adjusted result for woman's age, spouse's age, education level, gravidity, occupation, economic status, and body mass index

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychosocial factors related to the dietary habits of women undergoing PCC based on SCT structures. The results showed that, among the variables evaluated in this study, the strongest correlations were those of the variables of access to healthy food with daily consumption of fruits, perceived social support from the spouse with desired dietary habits, and self-efficacy with desired dietary habits. This implies that women who had more access to healthy food, greater self-efficacy, suitable dietary habits, and had perceived more support from their spouse had better dietary habits. In a qualitative study, participants considered the factor of access to appropriate and high-fibre food as the factor affecting the consumption of high-fibre food.[25] The results of the present study were also consistent with the results of another study which showed that access to healthy food is a facilitating factor in healthy dietary habits among adolescents.[26] Nevertheless, another study by Chang et al. on low-income pregnant women showed that access to healthy food was not correlated with healthy nutrition behaviors including low-fat and low-calorie foods consumption for weight control.[27] The inconsistency between the results of the present study and this study could be due to differences between the demographic characteristics of the participants of the two studies. In the present study, the economic status of the participants was generally reported to be moderate, however, in the study by Chang et al.[27] participants were selected from low-income population. The better economic condition of the women, as revealed in the present study, is probably the facilitator of healthy food purchases, which usually cost higher.[28] Access is an important factor as it affects the food choices of individuals, and hence, general policies should aim to increase women's access to healthy food.

This study also showed a direct correlation between the levels of perceived support from the spouse and desired dietary habits and daily consumption of dairy. In line with these results, a study among women of childbearing age in Iran showed a significant positive correlation between familial support and women's nutrition behaviors to promote health.[29] A qualitative study on the population of women seeking pregnancy at the reproductive age reported that for women spousal support was an important factor for implementing preconception nutritional recommendations.[30] Contrary to these results, the study by Fowles et al. among pregnant women in the United States showed that women's diet quality was not associated with spousal support.[31] These inconsistent results may be due to differences in the personal characteristics of the two populations. The women in the present study were all married, but in the study by Fowles et al., a greater number of the participants were unmarried, which is probably why spousal support was not evaluated. In this study, most women were homemakers, and this factor may be the cause of women's greater financial dependence upon their husbands, and consequently, the direct relationship of spousal support with better nutrition behaviors.

Nevertheless, regarding the relationship between self-efficacy and dietary habits, the results showed that self-efficacy had a significant inverse relationship with incorrect dietary habits and unhealthy food consumption, whereas it had a positive correlation with desired dietary habits and daily consumption of meat. In other words, self-efficient women had fewer incorrect dietary habits including the consumption of unhealthy foods, but more desired dietary habits and daily meat consumption according to the food guide pyramid. Another study showed that self-efficacy in healthy nutrition had a direct correlation with the consumption of fruits and vegetables.[20] The results of yet another study also showed that self-efficacy in healthy nutrition had a significant inverse relationship with the consumption of high-fat and high-calorie foods.[23] The results of the present study were consistent with that of the above mentioned studies. Consequently, it can be noted that self-efficacy is an important factor for healthy nutrition and could help women acquire the ability to overcome unhealthy nutritional behaviours.

One of the limitations of this study was its cross-sectional nature that cannot show the causal relationship between variables feature. Furthermore, awareness as a confounding variable was not investigated in this study and should be evaluated in future studies.


  Conclusion Top


The results showed that, to improve the nutritional status of women before pregnancy, interventional policies should be aimed at increasing women's access to healthy food and their self-efficacy to maintain healthy dietary habits. On the other hand, in PCC, the presence of husbands and their encouragement to support their wives in maintaining healthy nutritional behaviors can be an effective step toward having a safe pregnancy and a healthy future generation.

Acknowledgments

The author hereby appreciates the Research Deputy and technology of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences for funding this research with the approval number of IR.mui.rec. 1394.3.474 (2015.8.9) and respectable personnel of health centers in Isfahan and cooperation of the women who participated in the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to declare.



 
  References Top

1.
Haugen M, Brantsæter AL, Winkvist A, Lissner L, Alexander J, Oftedal B, et al. Associations of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcome and postpartum weight retention: A prospective observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:201.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Der Pal-de Bruin V, Karin M, Le Cessie S, Elsinga J, Jong-Potjer D, Lieke C, et al. Pre-conception counselling in primary care: Prevalence of risk factors among couples contemplating pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008;22:280-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hammiche F, Laven JS, Van mil N, De Cock M, De Vries JH, Lindemans J, et al. Tailored preconceptional dietary and lifestyle counselling in a tertiary outpatient clinic in the Netherlands. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2432-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Huijgen NA, Van De Kamp ME, Twigt JM, De Vries J H, Eilers PH, Steegers EA, et al. The Preconception Dietary Risk score; A simple tool to assess an inadequate habitual diet for clinical practice. E Spen J 2014;9:e13-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gardiner PM, Nelson L, Shellhaas CS, Dunlop AL, Long R, Andrist S, et al. The clinical content of preconception care: Nutrition and dietary supplements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:S345-56.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bao W, Tobias DK, Olsen SF, Zhang C. Pre-pregnancy fried food consumption and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2014;57:2485-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Dave A, Maru L, Daksha S, Natu N. Weight dose matter a study of obesity on pregnancy and its outcome. JSAFOG 2013;5:107-10.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Aviram A, Hod M, Yogev Y. Maternal obesity: Implications for pregnancy outcome and long-term risks-a link to maternal nutrition. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011;115:S6-10.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Melzer, K, Schutz Y. Pre-pregnancy and pregnancy predictors of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:S44-52.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Køpp US, Dahl-Jorgensen K, Stigum H, Andersen LF, Nass Ø, Nystad W. The associations between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index or gestational weight change during pregnancy and body mass index of the child at 3 years of age. Int J obes (Lond) 2012;36:1325-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cuervo M, Gonil L, Santiago S, Zazpe I, Garcia A, Martinez JA. Sociodemographic and dietary profile of 4,471 childbearing-age women planning a pregnancy. Nutr Hosp 2014;29:337-43.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York, N.Y: McGraw Hill Medical; 2014. p. 966.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Temel S, Van Voorst SF, Jack BW, Denktas S, Steegers EA. Evidence_based preconceptional life style interventions. Epidemiol Rev 2014;36:19-30.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Cuco G, Fernandez-Ballart J, Sala J, Viladrich C, Iranzo R, Vila J, et al. Dietary patterns and associated lifestyles in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:364-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tomedi LE, Chang CC, Newby P, Evans RW, Luther JF, Wisner KL, et al. Pre-pregnancy obesity and maternal nutritional biomarker status during pregnancy: A factor analysis. Public Health Nutr 2013;16:1414-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Luton D, Forestier A, Courau S, Ceccaldi PF. Preconception care in France. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2014;125:144-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mitchell EW, Levis DM, Prue CE. Preconception health: Awareness, planning, and communication among a sample of US men and women. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:31-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Nemati A, Panah Mogadam A. Assessment of nutritional status of women at reproductive age in ardebil province Iran. Res J Biol Sci 2008;3:116-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Xie Y, Madkour AS, Harville EW. Preconception nutrition, physical activity, and birth outcomes in adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015;28:471-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med 2007;34:304-12.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Abdeyazdan Z, Moshgdar H, Golshiri P. Evaluating the effect of lifestyle education based on health belief model for mothers of obese and overweight school-age children on obesity-related behaviours. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2017;22:248.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hales SB, Davidson C, Turner-McGrievy GM. Varying social media post types differentially impacts engagement in a behavioral weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med 2014;4:355-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Byrd-Bredbenner C, Abbot JM, Cussler E. Relationship of social cognitive theory concepts to mothers' dietary intake and BMI. Matern Child Nutr 2011;7:241-52.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Anderson ES, Wojcjk JR, Winett RA Williams DM, Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: The influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychol 2006;25:510.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Keshani P, Farvid M. Perceived benefits and barriers regarding high fiber food intake in type 2 diabetes patients-a qualitative study. Iran J Nutr Scis Food Technol 2012;7:11-22.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lubans DR, Plotnikoff RC, Morgan PJ, Dewar D, Costigan S, Collins CE. Explaining dietary intake in adolescent girls from disadvantaged secondary schools. A test of Social Cognitive Theory. Appetite 2012;58:517-24.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chang MW, Prnitzke S, Brown R, Baumann L. Predictors of low-income, obese mothers' use of healthful weight management behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011;43:87-95.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Seguin R, Connor L, Nelson M, Lacroix A, Eldridge G. Understanding barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and active living in rural communities. J Nutr Metab 2014;2014:146502.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Mirghafourvand M, Baheiraei A, Nedjat S, Mohammadi E, Charandabi SM, Majdzadeh RA. Population-based study of health-promoting behaviors and their predictors in Iranian women of reproductive age. Health Promot Int 2014;30:586-94.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Squiers L, Mitchell EW, Levis DM, Lynch M, Dollna S, Margolls M, et al. Consumers' perceptions of preconception health. Am J Health Promot 2013;27:S10-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Fowles ER, Stang J, Bryant M, Kim S. Stress, depression, social support, and eating habits reduce diet quality in the first trimester in low-income women: A pilot study. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:1619-25.  Back to cited text no. 31
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5410    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded112    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal