Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 950
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 417-427

The needs of women who have experienced “maternal near miss“: A systematic review of literature


1 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, Iran
3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Date of Submission06-Apr-2019
Date of Decision02-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance16-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication7-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Talat Khadivzadeh
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_77_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Maternal Near Miss (MNM) event is associated with emotional, psychological, and social effects on women. Determining the needs of women with these experiences is the key to programming for providing high-quality care and reducing its burden. Hence, this study was conducted to determine the needs of women who have experienced MNM. Materials and Methods: In this literature systematic review, to achieve the intended information, articles published in Web of Science and PubMed databases were systematically searched. The search strategy focused on three keywords or phrases: “maternal morbidity“ OR “maternal near miss“ AND “needs.“ Publication date was all relevant articles before 2019, and publication language was restricted to English. Article search was conducted by two independent reviewers. After the primary search, 2140 articles were found. Eventually, 77 articles, including 20 qualitative studies and 57 quantitative studies, were enrolled for final evaluation. Results: According to the results, the needs of these women could be categorized into six groups of “Management and care needs of health system,“ “Educational needs of health system,“ “Follow up and continuity of care at the primary care level,“ “Need to develop a physical, psychological and social of care packages,“ “Social support,“ and “Psychosocial support and counseling.“ Conclusions: The near-miss events change the mothers' living conditions, and therefore, they need to receive special support, given the difficult conditions they are undergoing. It is necessary that a supportive program be designed to follow-up MNM after the discharge to be run by the primary care team.

Keywords: Childbirth, maternal morbidity, maternal near miss, pregnancy, systematic review


How to cite this article:
Abdollahpour S, Heydari A, Ebrahimipour H, Faridhosseini F, Khadivzadeh T. The needs of women who have experienced “maternal near miss“: A systematic review of literature. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2019;24:417-27

How to cite this URL:
Abdollahpour S, Heydari A, Ebrahimipour H, Faridhosseini F, Khadivzadeh T. The needs of women who have experienced “maternal near miss“: A systematic review of literature. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 6];24:417-27. Available from: http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2019/24/6/417/270571




  Introduction Top


Maternal Near Miss (MNM) refers to a condition when a woman nearly dies but survives from a complication occurring during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy.[1],[2] Near-miss cases have similar characteristics with maternal deaths and can tell us the root causes of acute complication. Accordingly, they provide valuable information on obstetric care allowing for reformative action to be taken on identified delays to reduce the related mortality and morbidity.[3] The prevalence of near-miss mothers in Brazil and India is 12.8 and 15.1 per 1,000 live births,[4],[5] respectively. In addition, in a meta-analysis study in Iran, it was reported as 2.5 per 1,000 live births.[6] MNM has received less attention and often failed to access standard support as mothers' experiences are very extreme or different to the norm.[7] Nevertheless, recent research and reviews have sought to address this.[8] The reason is that although the absolute number of annual maternal deaths is approximately 500,000, a further 9 million women are estimated to suffer from maternal mortality or near miss. Of these, a lot of them will experience long-term physical and psychological effects, thereby contributing to the maternal complications;[9] all the mothers and their partners experience some unpleasant long-term consequences of their near-miss event.[7] The health of women and their empowerment in the community are a central concept in the Sustainable Development Goals[10] and there have been calls for “rethinking maternal health“ throughout the life cycle.[11]

For many mothers, hospitalization in the intensive care unit and separation from the infant is hard.[8] Mothers who experience near miss have progressed to death, such that they may have organ failure or discharged from hospital having had a major emergency treatment or spent time in the intensive care. Some of them may even have lost their baby as a result of their complications; Babies delivered premature may need to be admitted to the Neonatal Department.[12] Their experiences are very different from a normal delivery. Meanwhile, additional studies are required to enhance the knowledge about the overall burden of severe maternal morbidity, its relationship with the motherhood role, and pathological conditions such as traumatic childbirth[13] as well as occurrence of posttraumatic stress and anxiety, panic attacks, flashbacks,[14] fear of repregnancy in the future, lack of support and social isolation,[12] and developing postpartum depression.[15]

Therefore, by gaining a deeper understanding of the MNM and adverse consequences of pregnancy-related events, opportunities may be found for preventive intervention.[16] Furthermore, available data should be collected to understand mother's needs and to manage the burden resulting from this event which affects millions of women in the world.[17] Hence, determining the needs of mothers with these experiences is the key to programming and integrated postpartum care. Indeed, it is important to recognize the mothers' needs for evaluating the physical, psychological, and social burden of maternal near-miss conditions. Because no study has been conducted that is consistent with the purpose of the present study, this study was conducted to identify the needs of mothers who have experienced MNM.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.[18] This literature review was conducted in March 2019. In this study, to achieve the intended information, systematically published articles in PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched, where 498 and 617 of the published articles before March 2019 were found in each, respectively. We reviewed the list of reference of the relevant articles. Furthermore, to cover more articles, the Google Scholar database was searched, whereby 1022 articles were extracted. All articles were searched in English. The search strategy focused on three keywords or phrases: “maternal morbidity“ OR “maternal near miss“ AND “needs.“ We used broad inclusion criteria to provide a detailed systematic review of the topic. It must be noted that article search was conducted by two independent reviewers and all the studies reviewed eligible articles by reviewing the title and abstract. Any disagreement between these two was resolved through discussion and by considering the goals of the study, and the opinion of a third person was requested, if necessary. The full texts of the selected abstracts were, subsequently, screened. After the primary search of different databases, 2140 articles were found. The extracted articles were evaluated according to the inclusion criteria in two steps. During the first step, 2052 articles out of 2140 were eliminated because of being a duplicate or qualifying the exclusion criteria. During the second step, nine articles were eliminated for having different (irrelevant) titles and goals as well as due to lack of a full text. Eventually, 77 articles including 20 qualitative and 57 quantitative studies were enrolled for final evaluation [Figure 1].
Figure 1: PRISMA diagram for the selection process of the articles

Click here to view


The articles presented in conferences and seminars, case reports, and letters to editor were excluded. Furthermore, lack of access to the full texts of the articles was considered as an exclusion criterion. Eventually, the selected articles were studied to determine the needs of mothers who have experienced MNM.

Ethical considerations

Research ethics confirmation (ethics code: IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC.1398.009) for this study was received from the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.


  Results Top


Study selection outcome

After reviewing the results of studies, considering the extensive and various needs of MNM mothers, the needs were categorized into six classes of (1) management and care needs of health system, (2) educational needs of health system, (3) follow-up and continuity of care at the primary care level, (4) need to develop a physical, psychological, and social of care packages, (5) social support, and (6) psychosocial support and counseling. A summary of the results is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Studies in the field of the needs of the women who have experienced maternal near miss

Click here to view


Management and care needs of the health system

This category of needs includes the responsiveness of the health system to the delay in the treatment of mothers, especially in emergency situations. Providing quality care is one of the most important pillars of these needs. The philosophy proposed in Beyond the Numbers (BTN) and its methodologies for case reviews can be the first step in this process. The results of case reviews pinpoint what, if any, avoidable or remediable clinical, health system factors were present in the care provided to the mothers enabling healthcare providers to learn from the errors of the past.[19] Use of audit of near-miss case can enhance the quality of service, especially in areas where the maternal mortality is low. In this situation, there is a need to shift focus to maternal near-miss cases, which is a beneficial adjunct to maternal death issues.[20] Auditing makes causes evidence-based practice and wide information of these efforts to result in reduced preventable maternal morbidity and mortality where serial reviews would aid in resolution of the delays.[21] There should be better communication between levels of care and should be emphasized to allow early identification and referral of mothers for quick management.[22] Another issue that is important in the management and quality of care is to preserve and protect human dignity, and to consider human rights and equity, especially in non-native and migrant mothers. The experiences of mothers suggested that the need to provide fair treatment with respect and improved communication are the challenge for the health system and staff.[23] On the other hand, maternal morbidity is an inequality and discrimination in woman's human right: the right to life and survival; there is a dire need to prevent these unpleasant morbidities by improving the quality of care such as providing safe abortion services.[24] In addition, to provide quality services, the maternal morbidity-avoidable factors in hospitals should be identified and understood better, which can be cited for emergency obstetric causes such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, hemorrhage, sepsis, and thromboembolism.[25],[26]

Educational needs of the health system

Health system should develop educational programs and draft targeted protocols at both the national and international levels.[27] For example, midwives who are capable in obstetric emergency care are well-placed to provide quality care to sick mother within an intensive care unit.[28] In addition, mothers should be educated and encourage the public to opt for prompt pregnancy and childbirth care.[29] Nevertheless, they did not always provide holistic education to all mothers prior to discharge from the hospital.[30] There is a need for midwives to provide important messages about potential warning signs to reduce the severity of the complications.[30] Intervention to improve knowledge of maternal morbidity is required, specifically for socially low-level people or those living in rural areas.[29]

Follow-up and continuity of care at the primary care level

Reproductive health services should be prioritized to prevent adverse consequence. Hence, when a mother suffers from MNM, midwives should be aware of the hospital's discharge time.[12] Primary care providers should be made routinely aware if a mother has had a near-miss event, so that they can suggest the support such a mother needs and be aware that these new mothers may have interrupted their relationship with social networks.[7] Follow-up appointments with midwifery staff are helpful for mothers with severe maternal morbidities. Meanwhile, mothers reported that they felt they needed these supports at various times after the event; flexibility beyond the standard timing of 6 weeks postpartum would be beneficial.[12] They require continuity of care at the primary care level beyond the customary 6 weeks postpartum.[31] Maternal health programs should deal with both averting the loss of life and with ameliorating care of severe maternal morbidities at all levels including primary care.[32]

Need to develop a physical, psychological, and social of care packages

The study by Norhayati et al. suggested that the mental and physical prognosis of mothers who experienced severe maternal morbidity is poor and there is a need to identify the persistence of these outcomes over a longer postpartum period; these findings may help provide guidance for staff for preventive care.[33] For example, for some complications of pregnancy and childbirth, such as hysterectomy, formulating a plan of care for mothers identifiably at risk of postpartum hemorrhage and ensuring appropriate follow-up counselling are important, as they are key to reducing the psychological symptoms experienced by such mothers.[34] In addition, many mothers who had experienced near-miss did not receive accurate information about their illness prior to discharge from hospital, which is necessary to pay attention to the quality of service to all aspects that reduce the burden of long-term mental problems,[35] so different information and support needs for mothers should be considered whatever policies are implemented such as follow-up of new mothers in the critical care unit who are separated from their baby or breastfeeding.[36]

Social support

Social support includes the care and attention of the mother who has maternal morbidity, including family, friends, acquaintances, and especially the husband. The role of men can be complex where social and cultural traditions may disagree with health recommendations. Sometimes, social protection is essential for MNM's partners who are often found witnessing the emergency shocking and distressing. Support from health providers is very important, and clear communication from medical staff is highly valued.[37] So MNM obstetric events deeply affect them.[38] Getting social support from others who have similar experiences may enhance the positive experiences of mothers, which in turn can improve the wellbeing of mothers, strengthen the mother–child relationship, and increase the dynamics of families.[39] An example is mothers who have social needs to establish breastfeeding.[40] There is critical need to provide support to survivors to enable them cope with social, physical, psychological, and economic consequences.[41] The implementation of integrated care which involves psychological, spiritual, physical, and social supports of women's health may help diminish the burden that maternal morbidity impose on women around the world.[42]

Counseling and psychosocial support

Maternal counseling and psychological support aim at reducing the problems such as depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and wellbeing, coping, and emotional support such as disability, disempowerment, and self-isolation on the social networks. There is already some follow-up in service centers; currently after discharge, most mothers are visited by a midwife who usually carries out a postnatal depression screen, but these services do not cover all their needs. For this reason, recent studies have drawn attention to the potential for long-term psychological impact on mothers of maternal morbidities.[34],[36],[43],[44],[45] In addition to their physical recovery, mothers can experience depression, anxiety, and flashbacks in the aftermath; birth trauma can have lasting consequences affecting both the infant and family wellbeing.[46] Hinton et al. observed the profound long-term impact a near-miss in childbirth can have on new mothers. Although the mothers wished to take care of their baby, they could not do it, so other family members were also affected.[7] In this study, some mothers after discharge from the hospital were supported and contacted with midwives and visited regularly.[7] Mothers often face significant emotional and psychological health issues in the transition to motherhood.[47] The results of the study by Abdollahpouret al. suggested that traumatic childbirth events have the potentials to lead to psychological problems;[13] early interventions and counseling such as skin-to-skin contact between the mother and the baby can improve such mothers' mental health[16] and reduce posttraumatic stress postpartum.[48] After discharge of a near-miss mother, implications include more formal support for mothering when they are in maternal critical care and counseling for partners following this event.[49] There should be a transparent pathway for access to counselling services for near-miss mothers.[12] These counseling services should be provided for successful breastfeeding,[40] sexual problems, and marital problems.[50] Investigation of long-term repercussions of MNM on women's sexual life aspects has been scarcely performed, indicating that worse consequences for those experiencing morbidity are beyond depressive symptoms and postpone sexual activity.[51]


  Discussion Top


This study determined the needs of mothers who have experienced MNM which has been described in six sections. The most important demands and needs of many mothers who survive near-miss complications include the support and attention of healthcare providers during and after hospitalization. Most mothers express emotional and psychological reactions to MNM including anxiety, sorrow, and anger,[52] constituting “maternal near-miss syndrome.“[42] The consequences of these events include loss of life, loss of fertility, loss of body image, loss of quality of life, and dissatisfaction of marital relationships.[41] On the other hand, Hinton et al.'s study highlighted the importance of communication between primary and secondary care and showed that proper support from service providers completely changed the lives of these mothers.[7] Mothers who received support from healthcare providers had a shorter physical and mental recovery, and the received support was very valuable to them.[12] Talking through events with midwives at follow-up visits can also be valuable in helping mothers understand what has happened to them.[12],[15] In addition, health problems in partners after a near-miss experience may have a big impact financially, practically, and emotionally.[12],[38] Consultation with spouses should be done, because fear of reoccurrence of events in the future pregnancy will reduce the desire for childbearing.[12] Counseling can make a real difference to how mothers and their partners cope with the emergency and recovery, because many mothers who develop MNM fail to access the required critical care due to failure to recognize danger signs.[41] Pregnancy and childbirth care packages require adaptation if they are to meet the identified health needs of mothers. Also, to defeat this persistent problem and to decrease the burden of MNM, we need to educate the general public to opt for immediate postnatal care.[25],[31],[42] One of the limitations of this study was that due to the large number of articles and the wide range of MNM needs, few electronic databases were selected.


  Conclusion Top


According to the researcher review of literature, there has been no systematic review of the needs of near-miss mothers. The importance of this issue is that the lives of these mothers will be different from other mothers after pregnancy and childbirth. They need to receive special support given the difficult conditions they are undergoing. These mothers should not be the victims of problems that are contrary to the law of human rights as they are pregnant. Furthermore, to eliminate discrimination against them, we must strive to improve their wellbeing not only on the level with other mothers and bring them back to normal life. Therefore, it is necessary in the first step to reach the quality of care with the audit and to prevent avoidable morbidity. Then, in the next step, with the support of mothers, we reduce the burden of unavoidable complications to return them to normal life. Health providers should be conscious for problems caused by the impact that the near-miss experience can have on the whole family and be prepared to offer consultation about future childbearing. To improve the quality of care, a flexible appointment should be made for near-miss mothers who are not ready for follow-up or auditing sessions. Therefore, for future implication, it is recommended that a supportive program be designed to follow-up MNM after the discharge to be run by the primary care team.

Acknowledgment

The researchers express their appreciation for the financial support of the university. This article was derived from a PhD thesis with project number 971489.

Financial support and sponsorship

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to declare.



 
  References Top

1.
Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox SM, Kilpatrick S. Defining a conceptual framework for near-miss maternal morbidity. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972) 2002;57:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pattinson R, Hall M. Near misses: A useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. Br Med Bull 2003;67:231-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cochet L, Pattinson R, Macdonald A. Severe acute maternal morbidity and maternal death audit-a rapid diagnostic tool for evaluating maternal care. South Afr Med J 2003;93:700-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Oliveira LC, da Costa AA. Maternal near miss in the intensive care unit: Clinical and epidemiological aspects. Rev Bras Tera Intensiva 2015;27:220-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Abha S, Chandrashekhar S, Sonal D. Maternal near miss: A valuable contribution in maternal care. J Obstet Gynecol India 2016;66:217-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Abdollahpour S, Miri H, Khadivzadeh T. The maternal near miss incidence ratio with WHO Approach in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019;24:159-66.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Support for mothers and their families after life-threatening illness in pregnancy and childbirth: A qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2015;65:e563-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Maternal critical care: What can we learn from patient experience? A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006676.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Campbell OM, Graham WJ, Mills A, Borghi J, et al. Maternal health in poor countries: The broader context and a call for action. Lancet 2006;368:1535-41.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran M, Arreola-Ornelas H, et al. Women and health: The key for sustainable development. Lancet 2015;386:1165-210.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Knaul FM, Langer A, Atun R, Rodin D, Frenk J, Bonita R. Rethinking maternal health. Lancet Global Health 2016;4:e227-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Knight M, Acosta C, Brocklehurst P, Cheshire A, Fitzpatrick K, Hinton L, et al. Beyond maternal death: Improving the quality of maternal care through national studies of “near-miss“ maternal morbidity. Programme Grants Applied Research 2016;4:1-180.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abdollahpour S, Mousavi SA, Motaghi Z, Keramat A, Khosravi A. Prevalence and risk factors for developing traumatic childbirth in Iran. J Public Health 2017;25:275-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Experiences of the quality of care of women with near-miss maternal morbidities in the UK. BJOG 2014;121:20-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Abdollahpour S, Keramat A, Mousavi SA, Khosravi A. The effect of debriefing and brief cognitive-behavioral therapy on postpartum depression in traumatic childbirth: A randomized clinical trial. J Midwifery Reprod Health 2018;6:1122-31.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Abdollahpour S, Bolbolhaghighi N, Khosravi A. The effect of early skin-to-skin contact on the mental health of mothers in traumatic childbirths. Int J Health Stud 2016;2:5-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Firoz T, Chou D, von Dadelszen P, Agrawal P, Vanderkruik R, Tunçalp O, et al. Measuring maternal health: Focus on maternal morbidity. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91:794-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Inter Med 2009;151:264-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
World Health Organization. Making pregnancy safer: Multi-country review meeting on maternal mortality and morbidity audit “Beyond the Numbers“: Report of a WHO meeting, Charvak, Uzbekistan 14-17 June 2010. Making pregnancy safer: Multi-country review meeting on maternal mortality and morbidity audit “Beyond the Numbers“: Report of a WHO meeting, Charvak, Uzbekistan 14-17 June 2010.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Venkatesh S, Ramkumar V, Sheela C, Thomas A. Implementation of WHO near-miss approach for maternal health at a tertiary care hospital: An audit. J Obstet Gynecol India 2016;66:259-62.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kleppel L, Suplee PD, Stuebe AM, Bingham D. National initiatives to improve systems for postpartum care. Mater Child Health J 2016;20:66-70.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mbachu II, Ezeama C, Osuagwu K, Umeononihu OS, Obiannika C, Ezeama N. A cross sectional study of maternal near miss and mortality at a rural tertiary centre in southern nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:251.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Mohammadi S, Carlbom A, Taheripanah R, Essen B. Experiences of inequitable care among Afghan mothers surviving near-miss morbidity in Tehran, Iran: A qualitative interview study. Int J Equity Health 2017;16:121.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Zafar H, Ameer H, Fiaz R, Aleem S, Abid S. Low socioeconomic status leading to unsafe abortion-related complications: A third-world country dilemma. Cureus 2018;10:e3458.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Iwuh I, Fawcus S, Schoeman L. Maternal near-miss audit in the metro west maternity service, Cape Town, South Africa: A retrospective observational study. South Afr Med J 2018;108:171-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Mahmood NA, Sharif KM. Thromboembolism prophylaxis after cesarean section. Bahrain Med Bull 2018;40:22-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Tuli A, Rathi J, Garg N, Vashisht R. Foetomaternal outcome in eclampsia in tertiary care hospital. Education 2018;35:6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Eadie IJ, Sheridan NF. Midwives' experiences of working in an obstetric high dependency unit: A qualitative study. Midwifery 2017;47:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Widyaningsih V, Khotijah K. The patterns of self-reported maternal complications in Indonesia: Are there rural-urban differences? Rural Remote Health 2018;18:4609.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Suplee PD, Bingham D, Kleppel L. Nurses' knowledge and teaching of possible postpartum complications. MCN Am J Mater Child Nurs 2017;42:338-44.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Filippi V, Chou D, Barreix M, Say L, Group WMMW, Barbour K, et al. A new conceptual framework for maternal morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;141:4-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
David E, Machungo F, Zanconato G, Cavaliere E, Fiosse S, Sululu C, et al. Maternal near miss and maternal deaths in Mozambique: A cross-sectional, region-wide study of 635 consecutive cases assisted in health facilities of Maputo province. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:401.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Norhayati MN, Surianti S, Nik Hazlina NH. Metasynthesis: Experiences of women with severe maternal morbidity and their perception of the quality of health care. PLoS One 2015;10:e0130452.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Elmir R, Schmied V, Jackson D, Wilkes L. Between life and death: Women's experiences of coming close to death, and surviving a severe postpartum haemorrhage and emergency hysterectomy. Midwifery 2012;28:228-35.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Furniss M, Conroy M, Filoche S, MacDonald EJ, Geller SE, Lawton B. Information, support, and follow-up offered to women who experienced severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;141:384-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Snowdon C. Information-hungry and disempowered: A qualitative study of women and their partners' experiences of severe postpartum haemorrhage. Midwifery 2012;28:791-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Partner experiences of “near-miss“ events in pregnancy and childbirth in the UK: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2014;9:e91735.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Mbalinda SN, Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Kakande N, et al. Male partners' perceptions of maternal near miss obstetric morbidity experienced by their spouses. Reprod Health 2015;12:23.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Shorey S, Chee C, Chong YS, Ng ED, Lau Y, Dennis CL. Evaluation of technology-based peer support intervention program for preventing postnatal depression: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7:e81.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Furuta M, Sandall J, Cooper D, Bick D. Severe maternal morbidity and breastfeeding outcomes in the early post-natal period: A prospective cohort study from one E nglish maternity unit. Matern Child Nutr 2016;12:808-25.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kaye DK, Kakaire O, Nakimuli A, Osinde MO, Mbalinda SN, Kakande N. Lived experiences of women who developed uterine rupture following severe obstructed labor in Mulago hospital, Uganda. Reprod Health 2014;11:31.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, Krupa F, Osis MJ. An emerging “maternal near-miss syndrome“: Narratives of women who almost died during pregnancy and childbirth. Birth 2009;36:149-58.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Furuta M, Sandall J, Bick D. Women's perceptions and experiences of severe maternal morbidity – A synthesis of qualitative studies using a meta-ethnographic approach. Midwifery 2014;30:158-69.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Thompson JF, Heal LJ, Roberts CL, Ellwood DA. Women's breastfeeding experiences following a significant primary postpartum haemorrhage: A multicentre cohort study. Int Breastfeed J 2010;5:5.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
la Cruz CZ, Coulter ML, O'rourke K, Amina Alio P, Daley EM, Mahan CS. Women's experiences, emotional responses, and perceptions of care after emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A qualitative survey of women from 6 months to 3 years postpartum. Birth 2013;40:256-63.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Fenech G, Thomson G. Tormented by ghosts from their past: A meta-synthesis to explore the psychosocial implications of a traumatic birth on maternal well-being. Midwifery 2014;30:185-93.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Jarrett PM. Pregnant women's experience of depression care. J Mental Health Train Educ Pract 2016;11:33-47.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Abdollahpour S, Khosravi A, Bolbolhaghighi N. The effect of the magical hour on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in traumatic childbirth: A clinical trial. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2016;34:403-12.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Cram F, Stevenson K, Geller S, MacDonald EJ, Lawton B. A qualitative inquiry into women's experiences of severe maternal morbidity. Kōtuitui: N Z J Soc Sci Online 2019;14:52-67.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Andreucci CB, Bussadori JC, Pacagnella RC, Chou D, Filippi V, Say L, et al. Sexual life and dysfunction after maternal morbidity: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:307.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Waterstone M, Wolfe C, Hooper R, Bewley S. Postnatal morbidity after childbirth and severe obstetric morbidity. BJOG 2003;110:128-33.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Abdollahpour S MZ. Lived traumatic childbirth experiences of newly delivered mothers admitted to the postpartum ward: A phenomenological study. J Caring Sci 2019;8:23-31.  Back to cited text no. 52
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed221    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal