Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1185
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 40-44

Predicting nurses' Psychological safety based on the forgiveness skill


Department of Psychology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Maryam Poormirzaei
Department of Psychology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_240_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Forgiveness, as an intentional denial of your right of anger and aversion from a harmful deed, is related to many psychological processes of human which results in more psychological safety for people. The present study aimed to predict the psychological safety of nurses through different dimensions of forgiveness skill. Materials and Methods: This correlational study was conducted on 170 nurses working in Kerman hospitals during 2016–2017 who were selected based on convenience random sampling. Edmondson psychological safety and Thompson Heartland forgiveness scale were used for data collection. Data were analyzed through Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression model. Results: TThe results indicated that psychological safety has a significant relationship with self-forgiveness (p= 0.0001) and other-forgiveness (p= 0.04). Further, only self-forgiveness could significantly predict 0.07 of psychological safety variance (p= 0.003). Conclusions: Self-forgiveness skill can improve the nurses' psychological safety and reduce the harms caused by job pressures by reinforcing positive psychological factors. It is recommended to teach forgiveness skill through holding in-service classes to staff and study the relationship between psychological safety with other social life skills among nurses.

Keywords: Forgiveness, Iran, nurse, safety


How to cite this article:
Rahmati A, Poormirzaei M. Predicting nurses' Psychological safety based on the forgiveness skill. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2018;23:40-4

How to cite this URL:
Rahmati A, Poormirzaei M. Predicting nurses' Psychological safety based on the forgiveness skill. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 20];23:40-4. Available from: http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2018/23/1/40/220959




  Introduction Top


Nowadays, due to professionalism and complexity of jobs, many people are working together in a workplace to achieve different organizational goals.[1] As interpersonal conflicts are inevitable at work,[2] an understanding of psychological safety as an influential factor should be emphasized. Psychological safety involves both people's understanding of the consequences of interpersonal conflicts in a special field such as workplace [1] and the way people react to this behavior such as when a person reports his mistake or propose a new idea.[3] Feeling of safety is regarded as a beneficial stimulus which develops a person's talent to cope with and solve problems, and plays a significant role on people's lifestyles in different ways.[4]

The study of the relationship between psychological safety and some other factors such as forgiveness, as an aspect of moral intelligence [5] and a strong factor for predicting job-related consequences,[2] can bring useful and practical advantages. Forgiveness means an awareness of one's own defects, tolerance of others' mistakes,[6] and providing a second chance to the wrongdoer to compensate for the mistake to be able to re-build confidence.[7] It is also defined as an endeavor for preserving love and trust in relationships, terminating harmful bias,[8] abstaining from revenge, and reconciling with the wrongdoer.[9]

People are different in their attitude toward forgiveness and its degree [10] Thompson et al. (2005) explained different kinds of forgiveness including self-forgiveness, other-forgiveness, and uncontrollable situations-forgiveness, which are defined as how a person responds to himself or others when he, others, or the situations cause harm or disappointment, while that action, speech, or behavior has contradicted their belief on the way for behaving.[11]

Some studies claim that people have more psychological safety when they have more forgiveness.[12],[13] Self-forgiveness in men and all other sorts of forgiveness in women predict less risks of suffering from depression. In general, it seems that self-forgiveness plays a more major role in psychological safety than other types of forgiveness.[14],[15] The relationship between psychological safety and self-forgiveness is strong although it may be indirect.[16] It is worth noting that each type of forgiveness differently influences on people's health.[17] For instance, uncontrollable situations-forgiveness plays a more important role than self- and other-forgiveness to predict depression among the elderly.[18]

Nowadays, the relationship between forgiveness as a strong factor to predict job-related consequences and psychological safety as an important part of mental health in workplace has attracted a lot of attention. However, the relationship between the dimensions of forgiveness and psychological safety has not been studied so far. Regarding the main reason for selecting nurses as the sample, we can refer to their psychological safety which is exposed to many damages due to their stressful and hectic jobs. Further, attempts to recognize their psychological safety can play a major role in the promotion of their service.[18] Therefore, the present study aimed to predict the nurses' psychological safety by considering forgiveness dimensions in Kerman hospitals.


  Materials and Methods Top


This is a correlational study which was conducted on 300 males and females working in Kerman hospitals such as Afzalipour, Shahid Bahonar, Shafa, and Fatemeh Al-Zahra in different shifts during October–December 2016 to January–March 2017. Based on Krejcie-Morgan table, 200 subjects were selected based on convenient random sampling, among whom 170 nurses answered two questionnaires including Edmondson psychological safety scale and Thompson Heartland forgiveness scale. The exclusion criterion was partial response or no response to the questionnaires.

The researchers obtained the approval of Ethics Committee and a written introduction letter from the nursing and midwifery school as well as the needed permissions from the health care centers' authorities. Then, they went to different wards of the hospitals and distributed the questionnaires. In order to observe the principle of equal conditions for the participants, and prevent any bias while answering the questionnaire, the distribution and collection of questionnaires were conducted individually and no further and biased information about the questionnaires was provided. The nurses were also asked to answer the questions based on the first impression and conception they got from each question. A demographic information such as age, gender, marital status, and years of service was obtained at the beginning of the study.

The measures used for the purpose of the present study were standardized questionnaires with acceptable psychometric properties and construct validity. Psychological safety scale was designed by Edmondson (1999) to assess psychological safety in teamwork. The questionnaire includes 7 five-point Likert scale questions (very much = 5, very little = 1). Questions 1, 3, and 5 are scored in reverse, and the score range is between 7 and 35 and higher scores indicate greater psychological security.[20] The questionnaire was translated in Farsi by Shams and Khalijiyan (2014). The construct validity of the questionnaire was confirmed and its reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (r = 0.80).[13]

Heartland's Forgiveness Scale (HFS) (Thompson et al., 2005) included 18 seven-point Likert scale questions (totally agree = 7, totally disagree = 1). Self-forgiveness (Questions 1 to 6), other-forgiveness (Questions 7 to 12), and uncontrollable situations-forgiveness (Questions 13 to 18) were regarded as three subscales. Scores range was 18–126 and higher scores mean more forgiveness.[11] Ebrahimi et al. (2015) reported the reliability of all scales and subscales through test–retest method, with a 2-week interval as 0.86, 0.74, 0.82, and 0.77, and its convergent validity through life satisfaction scale was reported to be 0.53.[19]

Data were analyzed through Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20 software based on descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics such as correlation coefficient and multiple regression. Before analyzing data through multiple regression, regression assumptions were checked and the results indicated that the data had a spatial scale, linear relation, normal distribution, and equal variance. In order to predict psychological safety, all dimensions of forgiveness as predictor variables were entered in the model in one step.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Psychology Department of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran and all ethical considerations including subjects' volunteer participation, obtaining informed consent from all subjects, and confidentiality of data were considered. Ethical code presented to the present study is E. A. 95. 08. 23.


  Results Top


[Table 1] indicates the demographic information about the subjects. Most of the participants are women (N = 135) and the number of men is 35. The subjects' age ranged between 21 and 53 [Mean (M) = 32; Standard deviation (SD) = 7.30]. The majority of sample are married (135 individuals) and have 1–9 years of service (M = 8.82; SD = 6.87). As shown in [Table 2], uncontrollable situations-forgiveness has the highest mean (28.05) compared to other subscales of forgiveness, and the lowest mean belongs to self-forgiveness (26.27). The correlation of all variables with each other is significant except the relationship between uncontrollable situations-forgiveness and psychological safety. [Table 3] shows the results of the multiple regression analysis on the predictor variables. As it is evident, among forgiveness subscales, it is only self-forgiveness that can significantly predict psychological safety (β = 0.30, p = 0.003), by which 0.07 of the psychological safety variance is explained.
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the sample

Click here to view
Table 2: Mean, standard deviation, and correlation of study variables

Click here to view
Table 3: Standardized coefficient, t-test, significant level, R, and R2 of multiple regression analysis

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study aimed to predict psychological safety of nurses through forgiveness dimensions. The results indicated that a direct and significant relationship was observed between forgiveness and psychological safety and among the subscales of forgiveness, only self-forgiveness could significantly predict psychological safety.

Therefore, as there are different sources for creating stress in health care jobs and nurses are suffering from a lot of psychological pressures, the identification of influential variables affecting on the psychological safety of the nurses should be prioritized for improving their psychological safety and reducing psychological stresses.[21]

The study on the role of forgiveness on positive and poor mental health has proliferated during the last decade.[14] However, little work has conceptually or empirically focused on the variety of forgiveness. Among the alternative dimensions of forgiveness, forgiveness of self and uncontrollable situations-forgiveness, which were emphasized in the present study, have attracted a lot of attention.[16]

Based on the results, a direct and significant relationship was observed between forgiveness and psychological safety. The results are congruent with those of some other studies (e.g., Miller and Worthington, 2015; Yanchus et al., 2014; Toussaint et al., 2014). Therefore, those who are enjoying more forgiveness, i.e. those who tolerate others' mistakes better,[6] are likely to give the chances of compensation and restoration of trust to others, and enjoy a higher degree of psychological safety.[7]

Only self-forgiveness could significantly predict psychological safety in the present study. The results are in line with those of other studies (e.g., Davis et al., 2015; Toussaint et al., 2016; Webb et al., 2013). In other words, people can experience less negative emotions, shame, and lower mental rumination, and less interpersonal conflicts, through self-forgiveness,[22] which directs their energy toward generating positive thoughts and establishing better relationships with others.[16]

Thus, health care employers such as nurses are constantly exposed to physical and psychological harms. Although physical safety is well ensured in workplaces, little attention has been paid to psychological safety.[23] Regarding the fact that nurses are suffering from a lot of psychological pressure, thanks to their stressful conditions of hospitals such as encountering deaths, patients with special diseases, accidents, etc., the creation of trust and safety among the group's working atmosphere can increase the chances of positive interaction and assisting other members in such a way that they are no longer concerned about their colleagues' reactions, resulting in increase in their psychological safety.[24],[25],[26]

In nurses' workplace, forgiveness not only plays a pivotal role in increasing physical and psychological health but also can improve the nurse–patient relationship and nurses' interaction with doctors.[27],[28] For example, they should be able to forgive when they are offended or treated them with disrespect, which is regarded as one of interprofessional relationship problems among Iranian nurses and physicians,[29] or when they are sued by patients, because doctors have failed to suggest them an effective, fast, and unrealistic treatment.[22] For these reasons, some suggest that the forgiveness should be considered as one of the criteria in international classification of training nurses.[30]

So far, a few studies have investigated the relationship between forgiveness and psychological safety, especially among nurses. The present study focused on this problem although there were some limitations such as the unwillingness of the hospitals' authorities to cooperate with the administrators of the questionnaires, tight schedules of some nurses' to answer the questionnaires, as one of the most important barriers of nursing research in Iran,[31] and nonrandom sampling.

The present study considered the relationship between psychological safety and forgiveness. However, further research is needed to expand our understanding of how psychological safety plays a role in other contexts or situations. Furthermore, it is recommended to teach forgiveness skill through holding in-service classes to staff and conduct other studies to investigate the relationship between psychological safety among nurses and other mental or social life skills so that the empirical and practical knowledge of the field can be increased.


  Conclusion Top


Based on the results of the study, it seems that improving and promoting the forgiveness skill among nurses as a working group of the society who are constantly exposed to mental pressures and job fatigue can lead to the enhancement of health factors such as psychological safety.


  Acknowledgment Top


The authors feel obliged to thank the respected personnels of Afzalipour, Shahid Bahonar, Shafa, and Fatemeh Al-Zahra hospitals.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Aranzamendez G, James D, Toms R. Finding antecedents of psychological safety: A step toward quality improvement. In Nursing forum 2015; 50, 171-178.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Toussaint L, Worthington EL, Van Tongeren DR, Hook J, Berry JW, Miller AJ, et al. Forgiveness Working Forgiveness, Health, and Productivity in the Workplace. Am J Health Promot 2016.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Derickson R, Fishman J, Osatuke K, Teclaw R, Ramsel D. Psychological safety and error reporting within veterans health administration hospitals. Journal of patient safety 2015; 11, 60-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Yan Q, Feng C, Wu T. The relationship between task conflict and team learning: The critical role of psychological safety. 5th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Medicine 2015.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tanner C, Christen M. Moral intelligence-A framework for understanding moral competences. In: Empirically informed ethics: Morality between facts and norms. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Räikkä J, Ahteensuu M. Forgiveness, tolerance, and genetic enhancement. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 2016:448-55.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Fehr R, Gelfand MJ, Nag M. The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychol Bull 2010;136:894-914.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Cochran KA. How do we forgive? An empirical framework for the underlying processes of overcoming interpersonal betrayal. Diss Appalachian State University 2014.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
McCullough ME, Kurzban R, Tabak BA. Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behav Brain Sci 2013;36:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Van Oyen Witvliet C, Van Tongeren DR, Luna LR. Measuring forgiveness in health-related contexts. In: Forgiveness and Health. The Netherlands: Springer; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Karaırmak Ö, Güloǧlu B. Forgiveness and PTSD among veterans: The mediating role of anger and negative affect. Psychiatry research 2014;219:536-542.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Miller AJ, Worthington Jr. Sex, Forgiveness, and Health. Forgiveness and Health. The Netherlands: Springer; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Shams G, Khaligian S. The effect of secure-base leadership components on the staff psychological safety: The role of leadership effectiveness. New Thoughts on Education 2014;33-53.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Davis DE, Ho MY, Griffin BJ, Bell C, Hook JN, Van Tongeren DR, et al. Forgiving the self and physical and mental health correlates: A meta-analytic review. J Couns Psychol 2015;62:329-35.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Toussaint LL, Shields GS, Slavich GM. Forgiveness, stress, and health: A 5-week dynamic parallel process study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2016:50:727-35.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Webb JR, Hirsch JK, Visser PL, Brewer KG. Forgiveness and health: Assessing the mediating effect of health behavior, social support, and interpersonal functioning. J Psychol 2013;147:391-414.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Svalina, SS, Webb JR. Forgiveness and health among people in outpatient physical therapy. Disability and rehabilitation 2012; 34:383-392.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Leroy H, Dierynck B, Anseel F, Simons T, Halbesleben JR, McCaughey D,... & Sels L. Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology 2012;97:1273.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ebrahimi M, Azkhosh M, Foroughan M, Dolatshahi B, Shoaai F. Role of failure to forgive self, others and uncontrollable situations in predicting depression among the elderly. Salmand 2015;10:2-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sanner B, Bunderson JS. Psychological safety, learning, and performance: A comparison of direct and contingent effects. Academy of Management Proceedings 2013.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Brown D, McCormack B.. Exploring psychological safety as a component of facilitation within the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Journal of clinical nursing 2016; 25, 2921-2932.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Toussaint LL, Worthington EL, Williams DR, editors. Forgiveness and health: Scientific evidence and theories relating forgiveness to better health. New York: Springer; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kotzé M, Steyn L.. The role of psychological factors in workplace safety. Ergonomics 2013; 56, 1928-1939.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Drury V, Craigie M, Francis K, Aoun S, Hegney DG. Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression and stress in registered nurses in Australia: Phase 2 results. Journal of Nursing Management 2014; 22, 519-531.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Erickson ME. Communication in Nursing. Elsevier: United States of America; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Darvishpour A, Joolaee S, Cheraghi MA, Mokhtari-Lakeh N. Iran's health policymakers' views on barriers and facilitators of nurse prescribing in their context: A qualitative study. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2016;21:297-305.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
27.
Yanchus NJ, Derickson R, Moore, SC, Bologna D, Osatuke K. Communication and psychological safety in veterans health administration work environments. Journal of health organization and management 2014; 28, 754-776.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Toussaint L, Barry M, Bornfriend L, Markman M. Restore: The journey toward self-forgiveness: A randomized trial of patient education on self-forgiveness in cancer patients and caregivers. J Health Care Chaplain 2014;20:54-74.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Nakhaee S, Nasiri A. Interprofessional relationships issues among Iranian nurses and physicians: A qualitative study. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2017;22:8-13.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
30.
Caldeira S, Aparício M, Pinto S, Silva RS. Bringing 'forgiveness' into the international classification for nursing practice. Int J Palliat Nurs 2016;22:421-2.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sanjari M, Baradaran HR, Aalaa M, Mehrdad N. Barriers and facilitators of nursing research utilization in Iran: A systematic review. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2015;20:529-39.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Empathy and cultural competence in clinical nurses: A structural equation modelling approach
Bahare Zarei,Mohaddeseh Salmabadi,Alireza Amirabadizadeh,Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin
Nursing Ethics. 2019; 26(7-8): 2113
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgment
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1104    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded90    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal