Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 180
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 317-321

Effect of peer education on the noise management in Iranian neonatal intensive care unit


1 Student Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Nursing and Midfery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University and Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission18-Jun-2015
Date of Acceptance04-Nov-2015
Date of Web Publication14-Apr-2016

Correspondence Address:
Mahboobeh Namnabati
Nursing and Midfery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University and Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1735-9066.180392

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Advancements in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) science and technology have increased the survival rate of preterm infants. Despite these advances, they are still facing with neurobehavioral problems. Noise level in NICU is a potential source of stress for preterm infants. It should be decreased to the standard level as much as possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of peer education on the performance of staff in noise management in the NICU.
Materials and Methods: A pre-post test quasi-experimental design was used. Fifty-eight staff members (nurses and physicians) participated in this study. Sound pressure levels were measured before and after the intervention. Peer education program formed the intervention. The staff performance in noise management was evaluated before and after the intervention by using a questionnaire. Data analysis was done by using t-test.
Results: The results of the study showed that the mean sound level in different environments significantly decreased after the intervention. It reached from 86.7 to 74.9 dB in the center of unit and from 68.2 to 48.50 dB in the infants' bedside (P < 0.0001). The mean score of the staff performance in noise management significantly increased after the intervention, compared to the pre-intervention score. It increased from 74.6 to 83.4 (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Peer education was found to be successful in noise management because behavioral changes were done to avoid generating unnecessary noise by the staff.

Keywords: Education, infants, intensive care unit, Iran, neonatal, noise, peer education, peer group


How to cite this article:
Biabanakigoortani A, Namnabati M, Abdeyazdan Z, Badii Z. Effect of peer education on the noise management in Iranian neonatal intensive care unit. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2016;21:317-21

How to cite this URL:
Biabanakigoortani A, Namnabati M, Abdeyazdan Z, Badii Z. Effect of peer education on the noise management in Iranian neonatal intensive care unit. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 8];21:317-21. Available from: http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2016/21/3/317/180392


  Introduction Top


Advances in technology and nursing care have led to the survival of many premature infants. Despite the advances, the premature infants are still at the risk of developmental problems that may remain with them throughout their life.[1] Receiving the sensory stimuli directly affects the brain development of fetuses and infants. Most of the human sensory systems develop before birth, and receiving high or low stimuli may interfere with the normal brain development.[2]

The hearing system of infants develops at 23 weeks of pregnancy in order to respond to stimuli.[2] The cochlea in middle ear and the auditory cortex in temporal lobe are the most important parts of the hearing system and environmental conditions easily affect development of these parts.[3] The muscular wall of uterus and amniotic fluid are the modulators of stimuli in uterus and provide suitable conditions for the growth and development of fetus by creating a dark and quiet environment.[4]

After birth, infants are exposed to the sound of alarms and noises of equipments. The American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended 45 dB as the maximum noise in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).[5] The sounds and noises in NICUs are much higher than 45 dB. Studies from USA have shown that infants in NICU are continuously exposed to sounds of 50–105 dB.[6],[7] In Iran, due to the large number of infants admitted to NICUs and the presence of staff and parents in the same unit, the hospitalized infants suffer from a lot of noises related to equipments, staff, and mothers. Studies show that the volume measured during the day is a minimum of 65.4 dB and a maximum of 89.8 dB.[8],[9]

The exposure of premature infants to a lot of noise impedes their growth and development, and causes cognitive, verbal, and hearing disabilities.[10] The study of Lasky and Williams in 2009 showed that the sound level is higher than the standard amount proposed for premature infants and changes their cycles of sleep and breathing patterns.[11] The study of Wachman and Lahav in 2010 also revealed that the loud noise causes short-term negative impact on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems of premature infants.[12]

In general, the healthcare team, including nurses, physicians, and parents, produces a lot of noise with medical and nursing care during the daily activity, which can interfere in improving the health of infants.

Today, organizations allocate a substantial part of their resources to teaching their employees and caring about their empowerment.[13] Peer-assisted learning system is one of the effective innovations in the field of education, which has constructive effects on different aspects of education, especially in the area of medical science. The system is a kind of education in which the learners play the role of teachers or teacher assistants and accelerate the learning of other students.[14] Several studies have shown that this type of education affects knowledge, attitude, and performance.[14],[15],[16],[17] Therefore, this study aimed to reduce noise in the NICU and improve the performance of staff in the NICU.


  Materials and Methods Top


This quasi-experimental study used a pre-test and post-test method during 2 months in the winter of 2014. Census was chosen as the sampling method. The participants in this study consisted of 58 staff (48 nurses and 10 physicians) in the NICU of a teaching hospital in Isfahan. The reason for choosing this center is that it is a referral hospital for the hospitalization of preterm deliveries and the infants at risk. The accumulation of a large number of staff and about 25–30 infants and their mothers in one place distinguished this hospital from the other hospitals with NICUs. The sound in this study was measured by ST-8851 sound level meter. This device records a sound range of 30–130 dB and was controlled with other devices in this area to ensure its accuracy. The accuracy of this device is at a frequency of 1.5 Hz equal to ±3 dB. The performance of the staff was measured by their answers to a questionnaire. The questionnaire was prepared by a review of literature and its reliability was approved by 10 professors of nursing and midwifery, neonatal specialists, and the staff of neonatal care unit of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The validity of the questionnaire was reviewed and the alpha coefficient was determined as 0.945. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part was concerned with the demographic characteristics of the participants and the second part assessed their performance based on 25 questions on noise control. Their answers to these questions were graded by a five-point Likert scale (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always) and the total scores ranged from 25 to 100.

The pre-tests were completed by the participants and the mean volume of sound in the unit was measured before the training on the basis of the standard method in terms of intervals and location of the measurement. It was measured for 36 h within 2 weeks using a standard sound level meter in different locations based on the standard protocol.[18] These locations included central location, entry area, infants' bedside, isolated area, and the nursing station. This measurement was recorded at the busiest hours of all three shifts (8–10 in the morning, 16–18 in the afternoon, and 20–22 at night).

After measuring the sound level, the peer education began. Five peer trainers (four nurses and one physician) were chosen from among the participants with the highest scores in pre-test and got direct training through classes, pamphlets, and posters. This training was about sound sources and the hazards of loud sounds on the neonates and staff.

Other participants were divided into four groups of nurses and one group of physicians. Peer trainers instructed their groups through face-to-face interaction and group discussion. Peer education lasted for two consecutive weeks.

After the completion of training, the mean sound level in different environments was measured and the post-tests were completed by all the participants including the peer trainers and their groups after a 3-week delay. There was no control group in this study. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software version 14. The registration ID in IRCT is IRCT2014122420423N1.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and also by the local authorities of the teaching hospital. The participants also signed a written informed consent. This information was kept confidential.


  Results Top


The results revealed that majority of the participants were nurses. The average of work experience was 6 years [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic data

Click here to view


The findings showed that before the intervention, the mean level of sound was from 63.3 to 86.7 dB in different parts of the NICU. After the intervention, the mean level of sound ranged between 48.5 and 74.9 dB. The results of the study showed that the mean sound level in different environments significantly decreased after the intervention. It reached from 86.7 to 74.9 dB in the unit center and from 68.2 to 48.50 dB in the infants' bedside [Table 2].
Table 2: The mean sound levels in different places of the NICU before and after the intervention (peer education)

Click here to view


The mean score of the staff performance was 74.6 before the intervention and reached 83.4 after it. Paired t

-test showed that the mean score of the staff in noise management significantly increased after the intervention, compared to the pre-intervention score (P < 0.001) [Table 3].
Table 3: The mean scores of staff performance before and after the intervention in the NICU

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The findings of this study show that the sound level was much higher than the recommended level in NICU. Before the intervention, the mean level of sound was between

63.3 and 86.7 dB in different parts of NICU. Similarly, studies reveal that the sound level was from 58 to 105 dB in NICUsin USA and Iran.[6],[8],[9] While Krueger et al. emphasized that the fetus receives 20–35 dB sound in the womb.[19] In fact, in NICUs, a premature infa t or a fetus outside the womb receives a volume of sound that is far beyond the level received in embryonic stage. In the present study, the maximum level of sound was about 86.7 dB in the NICU before the intervention. After the intervention, the mean level of sound significantly decreased. The mean level of sound reached around the standard sound level in the infants' bedside.

In a same vein, Zamberlan-Amorim et al. showed a significant reduction in noise level after training (P < 0.0001).[20] In this study, the noise reduction program was performed in partnership with the neonatal care team, and then the trained members of each group trained the other members and offered suggestions to change the performance of noise reduction. In the present study, peer education method was used and the staff participated in the training, and considerably good results were obtained in noise reduction and improvement of staff performance in this area.

On the contrary, the study of Jacob et al. in 2008 showed that there was no significant difference between the intensity of the sound in NICU before and after training.[21] In the present study, peer education method was used. The nurses and physicians were trained by their colleagues and observed the appropriate behavior for sound reduction. This training method was accepted by the staffs, and a significant reduction in the mean sound level in the unit was observed after the intervention. The results of the present study show that the mean score of the staff performance in noise management significantly increased after the intervention, compared to the pre-intervention score.

The study of Weich et al. showed that after running a training program for the staff regarding sound control in NICU, 71.5% of them agreed that their behavior makes the noise. According to the researcher, this sound control program was successful because the staffs were aware of the sound levels and accepted their behavioral changes to avoid sound, but there was no significant difference in the performance of the staffs.[22] In Weich et al.'s study, the training program included distribution of leaflets and installation of posters about the harmful effects of noise on neonates, two speeches, and informational lectures given by language therapist students about the harmful effects of sound and noise on neonates. In the present study, watching the peer trainers' performance changed the participants' behaviors in noise management.

The study of Laudert et al. showed that the highest volume of sound in NICU was made during the rounds. By running the round away from the infants' bedside, the volume of sound measured in the infants' bedside declined from 62.5 to 50–55 dB.[18] The findings of Laudert et al.'s study are similar to those of the present study. In the present study, peer training led to decrease of sound in the unit. The changes of staff performance in the present study were slow speaking, quiet walking, quick attention to alarms and turning them off, and running the round away from the infants' bedside.

In several studies, other aspects of peer education were studied, such as its impact on teaching skills, expanding the knowledge and information of students and increasing their self-esteem, as well as the impact on the knowledge and attitudes of patients, which has had a significant impact.[14],[15],[16],[17],[23]

Thus, peer education can be an effective approach in making changes, but due to the movement of large numbers of students, interns, residents, and staff in the university hospital and changing their place in units, these trainings should be continuous and used by the new healthcare team.

In this study, the noise measurement was performed within 2 weeks after the intervention and a significant reduction was observed in the volume. But it seems that this type of training also needs to continue. Due to the complex care in the NICU and the heavy workload in this unit, permanent commitment to observe silence is difficult and the training should continue.

The limitation of this study included participants' fatigue because of the high workload in the neonatal unit and also the refusal of physicians to participate in training classes and fill the questionnaires. The researcher attempted to motivate them to participate in these classes by giving them frequent encouragement at break times. It seems that making the staff to participate in these trainings will have good results on improvement of the neonatal unit.


  Conclusions Top


The results of this study show that peer education is a useful way for making changes in the area of medicine and nursing. The mean score of the performance of

the staff after the intervention significantly increased, and the sound levels in the unit reduced. However, the sound level in the unit was still higher than the standard level. Therefore,

these trainings should be continued in order to create a suitable environment for the growth and development of premature infants or fetus outside the uterus.

Acknowledgments

Hereby, words of gratitude go to all the members of the healthcare team of the selected teaching hospital in Isfahan University who helped us to collect data. This article was derived from a Master's thesis with project number 393593, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Financial support and sponsorship

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Students Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
HasekNogueira Mde F, Di Piero KC, Ramos EG, Souza MN, Dutra MV. Noise measurement in NICUs and Incubators with Newborns: A systematic literature review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2011;19:212-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hockenberry M, Wilson D. Wong's Nursing Care of Infants and Children. 9th ed. 2011. p. 334-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Graven SN, Browne MD. Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2008;8:187-93.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Als H, Butler S. Neurobehavioral development of the preterm infant. In: Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC, editors. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of the Fetus and Infant. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. p. 1057-75.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Altuncu E, Akman I, Kulekci S, Akdas F, Bilgen H, Ozek E. Noise levels in neonatal intensive care unit and use of sound absorbing panel in the isolette. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:951-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Krueger C, Schue S, Parker L. Neonatal intensive care unit sound levels before and after structural reconstruction. MCN 2007;23:358-62.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Berg LA, Chavez TC, Serpanos CY. Monitoring noise levels in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 2010;37:69-72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Abdeyazdan Z, Ghassemi S, Marofi M. The effects of earmuff on physiologic and motor responses in premature infants admitted in neonatal intensive care unit. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014;19:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Valizadeh S, Bagher Hosseini M, Alavi N, Asadollahi M, Kashefimehr S. Assessment of sound levels in a neonatal intensive care unit in Tabriz, Iran. J Caring Sci 2013;2:19-26.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
McMahon E, Wintermark P, Lahav A. Auditory brain development in premature infants: The importance of early experience. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1525:17-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lasky RE, Williams AL. Noise and light exposures for extremely low birth weight newborns during their stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009;123:540-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wachman EM, Lahav A. The effects of noise on preterm infants in the NICU. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;10:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abbaszadeh A, Sabeghi H, Heidary A, Borhani F. Assessment of the effect of continuing education program on nurse's knowledge, attitude and performance about documentation. Evid Based Care 2010;2:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alizadeh M, Gharibi F, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Esmaeilnasab N, Bostani Z, Zarghami F. Attitudes of medical instructors and students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences towards Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) system. The J Med Edu Devel 2012;7:48-57.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Shafai FS, Charandabi SM, Mamaghani MM, Salmani R. Educating female adolcents about iron deficiency and taking iron supplements and its influence on their peers. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2013;23:223-33.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Morowatisharifabad MA, Alizadeh Mradkandi A, Mozaffari Khosravi H, Fallahzadeh H, Momeni Sarvestani M. Comparison of the effect nutrition education by peers and health personnel on knowledge, attitude and nutritional indices of 18-35 years old women of Orumieh health care centers. J Shahid Sadoughi Uni Med Sci, Yazd, Iran 2012;11:56-64.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Deshpande SP., Joseph J. Impact of emotional intelligence, ethical climate, and behavior of peers on ethical behavior of nurses. JEB 2009;85:403-10.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Laudert S, Liu WF, Blackington S, Perkins B, Martin E, MacMillan-York E, et al. Implementing potentially better practices to support the neurodevelopment of infants in the NICU. J Perinatol 2007;27(Suppl 2):S75-93.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Krueger C, Horesh E, Crossland BA. Safe sound exposure in the fetus and preterm infant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012;41:166-70.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zamberlan-Amorim NE, Fujinaga CI, Hass VJ, Fonseca LM, Fortuna CM, Scochi CG. Impact of a participatory program to reduce noise in a Neonatal Unit. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2012;20:109-16.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Jacob A, Marilyn JA, Lotas M, Spinazzola R & Jones K. Effect of a multifaceted educational interventions program on decreasing noise in the NICU. Nurs Edu Nort Sho 2008;16:241-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Weich TM, Ourique AC, Tochetto TM, Franceschi CM. Effectiveness of a noise control program in a neonatal intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2011;23:327-34.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Vaghar Seyyedin A, Vanaki Z, Taghi S, Molazem Z. The effect of guided reciprocal peer questioning (grpq) on nursing students' critical thinking and metacognition skills. Iran J Med Educ 2009;8:333-40.  Back to cited text no. 23
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Effect of the Training of Nurses on the Reduction of Noise Pollution in Intensive Care Units
Z Godarzi,F Oskouie,K Azam,M Monazzam,T Loni,J Ghasemi,M Ahmadpoor
Iran Journal of Nursing. 2019; 31(116): 75
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1386    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded171    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal